W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > February 2009

Re: ABNF for fragment syntax

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:21:28 -0500 (EST)
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, public-media-fragment@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0902261019220.27913@ubzre.j3.bet>
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:

> By its sheer name, 'mediafragment' too obviously just addresses the
> 'fragment' and not the 'query' part of the URI. Maybe we can think of
> something better. That's why I suggested 'segment'. We could also use
> 'extract' or 'subpart' - something that incorporates the extraction of
> a thumbnail from a video as well as the creation of a video extract.

Let's gather proposals and start a poll :)

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 15:21:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:32 GMT