W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > February 2009

Re: ABNF for fragment syntax

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:41:16 +0000
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
CC: Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C5CD3B8C.24A1%michael.hausenblas@deri.org>

Other proposals:

* spatio-temporal region (st-region, region)
* section
* division
* cut

Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html
http://webofdata.wordpress.com/


> From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:17:07 +1100
> To: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
> Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Media Fragment
> <public-media-fragment@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: ABNF for fragment syntax
> 
> Awesome idea.
> 
> So we currently have:
> * mediafragment
> * segment
> * extract
> * subpart
> 
> any further ideas?
> 
> Cheers,
> Silvia.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>> 
>>> By its sheer name, 'mediafragment' too obviously just addresses the
>>> 'fragment' and not the 'query' part of the URI. Maybe we can think of
>>> something better. That's why I suggested 'segment'. We could also use
>>> 'extract' or 'subpart' - something that incorporates the extraction of
>>> a thumbnail from a video as well as the creation of a video extract.
>> 
>> Let's gather proposals and start a poll :)
>> 
>> --
>> Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
>> 
>>        ~~Yves
>> 
>> 
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 06:41:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:32 GMT