W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-fragment@w3.org > August 2009

Re: minutes of 2009-08-12 teleconference

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 13:43:58 +1000
Message-ID: <2c0e02830908262043w777e68aey33345388391caa2d@mail.gmail.com>
To: RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>
Cc: Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@cwi.nl>, Media Fragment <public-media-fragment@w3.org>, Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
2009/8/27 RaphaŽl Troncy <Raphael.Troncy@cwi.nl>

> Dear Jack, all,
>
>   <raphael> Correction, re TC0005
>>>  <raphael> Proposal: 200, the entire representation is returned
>>>  <raphael> Proposal: 200, the entire representation is returned
>>>
>>
>> This doesn't look right, from a design cleanliness point of view. Now we
>> have, for parameters that are known to refer to an empty selection, an error
>> for two of our axes (time, space) and the whole resource for two other axes
>> (id, track). If we decide to stick with this (after all: I wasn't in the
>> meeting, so who am I to complain:-) we need a paragraph with a very good
>> rationale as to why we treat these two differently.
>>
>> I think the "convenience" argument doesn't hold, because the most
>> convenient way to get the whole resource is to not specify the axis at all
>> (and I don't think we really need a convenient way to get an error
>> message:-).
>>
>
> I know you have discussed that in today's telecon. I understand from the
> minutes that:
>  - We need to carefully define the three different error cases:
> undefined/wrongly defined/not present;
>  - We might need to renumber the Test Cases;
>  - Michael might investigate whether there is programmatic tool to support
> that;
>
> Am I missing something? Do you agree with the approval of the TC0005 and
> TC0006 as they are in the wiki [1]?
>
>  RaphaŽl
>
> [1]
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/index.php?title=TestCases&oldid=796


We have given those use cases a different title and thus the previously made
decisions were acceptable, since the error case was put in a different class
and thus matched the other  error cases in that class. Jack was happy with
that. That should close this objection.

We have further discussed in detail how we can structure the test cases
along two axes and Michael will give it a go to create a table that
incorporates all the use cases. If he could find a tool that helps him
create the table, that would be useful (with text overlays etc).

Hope this clarifies it.

Cheers,
Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 27 August 2009 03:44:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 21 September 2011 12:13:34 GMT