Re: minutes of 2009-08-12 teleconference

Dear Jack, all,

>>   <raphael> Correction, re TC0005
>>   <raphael> Proposal: 200, the entire representation is returned
>>   <raphael> Proposal: 200, the entire representation is returned
> 
> This doesn't look right, from a design cleanliness point of view. Now we 
> have, for parameters that are known to refer to an empty selection, an 
> error for two of our axes (time, space) and the whole resource for two 
> other axes (id, track). If we decide to stick with this (after all: I 
> wasn't in the meeting, so who am I to complain:-) we need a paragraph 
> with a very good rationale as to why we treat these two differently.
> 
> I think the "convenience" argument doesn't hold, because the most 
> convenient way to get the whole resource is to not specify the axis at 
> all (and I don't think we really need a convenient way to get an error 
> message:-).

I know you have discussed that in today's telecon. I understand from the 
minutes that:
   - We need to carefully define the three different error cases: 
undefined/wrongly defined/not present;
   - We might need to renumber the Test Cases;
   - Michael might investigate whether there is programmatic tool to 
support that;

Am I missing something? Do you agree with the approval of the TC0005 and 
TC0006 as they are in the wiki [1]?

   Raphaël

[1] 
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/wiki/index.php?title=TestCases&oldid=796

-- 
Raphaël Troncy
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
2229, route des Crêtes, 06560 Sophia Antipolis, France.
e-mail: raphael.troncy@eurecom.fr & raphael.troncy@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8242
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.cwi.nl/~troncy/