W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2012

AW: AW: AW: AW: [ACTION-472] Compile list of status code issues / additional issues

From: Höffernig, Martin <Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:37:04 +0200
To: "tmichel@w3.org" <tmichel@w3.org>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CD9846F872C7874BB4E0FDF2A61EF09FEE772C9232@RZJC1EX.jr1.local>
Dear Thierry, all

Thank you for updating the dc and yt files.
I just found out that in the API implementation report [1], the JSON responses in Sec. 4 and Sec. 5 need to be updated as well according to these files.
At least, attributes containing no values (e.g. "language" : "") should be removed in the result sets.

Best,
Martin

[1]: http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/implementation-report.html

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2012 12:12
> An: Höffernig, Martin
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [ACTION-472] Compile list of status code
> issues / additional issues
>
> Martin,
>
>
> Note  that I have changed a typo in your JSON files  for DC and  YT.
>
>    in both files, I have chaged:
>
> "typeLabel": "creation date"
> to
> "typeLabel": "creation date",
>
> And thanks again for your valuable input.
>
> Best,
>
> thierry
>
>
> Le 20/06/2012 12:02, Thierry MICHEL a écrit :
> > Martin,
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the files,
> >
> > see my publications as indicated in line
> >
> > best,
> >
> > thierry
> >
> > Le 19/06/2012 14:36, Höffernig, Martin a écrit :
> >> Dear Thierry, all
> >>
> >> Please find enclosed the updated JSON and RDF files for DC and YT.
> >>
> >>
> >> DC (changes have been made in JSON as well as RDF):
> >> MADate:
> >> added "typeLabel": "creation date" in JSON.
> >
> >
> > JSON file published at
> >
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/JSON/normativ
> > e_json_ma_dc.json
> >
> >
> > and I also updated the JSON atomic files
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/json-
> responses/
> > da-date_ma_dc.json
> >
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/json-
> responses/
> > Db-date_ma_dc.json
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Keyword:
> >> added language information (xml:lang="en") in RDF.
> >>
> >> Copyright:
> >> changed RDF property for copyright description from
> >> ma:isCopyrightedBy to ma:copyright.
> >
> >
> > RDF file published at
> >
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/DC
> > _example1.rdf
> >
> >
> >>
> >> YT (changes made in JSON only):
> >> MADate:
> >> added "typeLabel": "creation date" in JSON.
> >>
> >> Keyword:
> >> fixed keyword results in JSON according to RDF data.
> >>
> >> Rating:
> >> added ratingSystemLabel attribute for Rating in JSON.
> >
> >
> >
> > JSON file published at
> >
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API10/JSON/normativ
> > e_json_ma_yt_oi.json
> >
> >
> >
> > and I also updated the JSON atomic files
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/json-
> responses/
> > ya-date_ma_YT.json
> >
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/json-
> responses/
> > ya-date_ma_YT.json
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/json-
> responses/
> > yb-date_ma_YT.json
> >
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/json-
> responses/
> > ya-keyword_ma_YT.json
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/json-
> responses/
> > yb-keyword_ma_YT.json
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/json-
> responses/
> > ya-rating_ma_YT.json
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/API/json-
> responses/
> > yb-rating_ma_YT.json
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Best,
> >> Martin
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>> Von: Höffernig, Martin [mailto:Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at]
> >>> Gesendet: Montag, 18. Juni 2012 15:58
> >>> An: tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> >>> Betreff: AW: AW: AW: [ACTION-472] Compile list of status code
> issues
> >>> / additional issues
> >>>
> >>> Dear Thierry, all,
> >>>
> >>> as announced in my last email, here are my comments regarding the
> >>> JSON youtube result set:
> >>>
> >>> MADate:
> >>> JSON:
> >>> { "MADate" : {
> >>>    "propertyName" : "date",
> >>>    "value" : "2010-01-26T10:00:00Z",
> >>>    "sourceFormat" : "yt",
> >>>    "mappingType" : "exact",
> >>>    "date" : "2010-01-26T10:00:00Z",
> >>>    "statusCode" : 200
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> RDF:
> >>> <ma:creationDate
> >>> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">
> >>> 2010-01-26T10:00:00Z
> >>> </ma:creationDate>
> >>>
> >>> Optional typeLabel attribute "creation date" missing JSON, although
> >>> related information available in RDF.
> >>>
> >>> Location:
> >>> JSON:
> >>> { "Location" : {
> >>>    "propertyName" : "location",
> >>>    "value" : "35.669998 139.770004",
> >>>    "sourceFormat" : "yt",
> >>>    "mappingType" : "exact",
> >>>    "longitude" : 35.669998,
> >>>    "latitude" : 139.770004,
> >>>    "altitude" : 0,
> >>>    "statusCode" : 200
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> RDF:
> >>> <ma:Location>
> >>>    <ma:locationLongitude
> >>> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal">
> >>>    35.669998
> >>>    </ma:locationLongitude>
> >>>    <ma:locationLatitude
> >>> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#decimal">
> >>>    139.770004
> >>>    </ma:locationLatitude>
> >>> </ma:Location>
> >>>
> >>> No altitude data available in RDF, however altitude in JSON is set
> >>> to zero.
> >>>
> >>> Keyword:
> >>> JSON:
> >>>
> >>>    { "Keyword" : {
> >>>      "propertyName" : "keyword",
> >>>      "value" : "SM ENTERTAINMENT Oh!",
> >>>      "sourceFormat" : "yt",
> >>>      "mappingType" : "exact",
> >>>      "keywordLabel" : "SM ENTERTAINMENT Oh!",
> >>>      "statusCode" : 200
> >>>      }
> >>>    },
> >>>
> >>> RDF:
> >>> <ma:hasKeyword rdf:parseType="Resource">
> >>>    <rdfs:label>
> >>>      SM ENTERTAINMENT
> >>>    </rdfs:label>
> >>> </ma:hasKeyword>
> >>>
> >>> <ma:hasKeyword rdf:parseType="Resource">
> >>>    <rdfs:label>
> >>>     Oh!
> >>>    </rdfs:label>
> >>> </ma:hasKeyword>
> >>>
> >>> JSON Keyword "SM ENTERTAINMENT Oh!" is concation of 2 different
> >>> keywords in RDF.
> >>> Seems to be a minor issue regarding the implementation report,
> since
> >>> the JSON result sets for 3 remaining keywords have been returned
> >>> correctly.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Rating:
> >>> JSON:
> >>>   { "Rating" : {
> >>>      "propertyName" : "rating",
> >>>      "value" : "4.6510544",
> >>>      "sourceFormat" : "yt",
> >>>      "ratingValue" : 4.6510544,
> >>>      "minimum" : 1,
> >>>      "maximum" : 5,
> >>>      "statusCode" : 200
> >>>      }
> >>>    },
> >>>
> >>> <ma:hasRatingSystem rdf:parseType="Resource">
> >>>    <rdfs:label>
> >>>     higherBetter
> >>>    </rdfs:label>
> >>> </ma:hasRatingSystem>
> >>>
> >>> Optional attribute ratingSystemLabel is not present in JSON result
> >>> set, required data would be available in RDF.
> >>>
> >>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>>> Von: Höffernig, Martin [mailto:Martin.Hoeffernig@joanneum.at]
> >>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Juni 2012 13:36
> >>>> An: tmichel@w3.org; public-media-annotation@w3.org
> >>>> Betreff: AW: AW: AW: [ACTION-472] Compile list of status code
> >>>> issues
> >>> /
> >>>> additional issues
> >>>>
> >>>> Dear Thierry, all,
> >>>>
> >>>> here are my comments regarding the DC JSON result document:
> >>>>
> >>>> MADate:
> >>>> JSON:
> >>>>   { "MADate" : {
> >>>>      "propertyName" : "date",
> >>>>      "value" : "2007-01-06T00:00:00.00",
> >>>>      "sourceFormat" : "dc",
> >>>>      "mappingType" : "related",
> >>>>      "date" : "2007-01-06T00:00:00.00",
> >>>>      "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>      }
> >>>>
> >>>> RDF:
> >>>> <ma:creationDate
> >>>> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime">
> >>>> 2007-01-06T00:00:00.00
> >>>> </ma:creationDate>
> >>>>
> >>>> Since this MADate result set refers to a creation date
> >>>> (ma:creationDate), typeLabel can be used to carry this information
> >>>> in addition to the current result set:
> >>>> "typeLabel": "creation date"
> >>>>
> >>>> Location:
> >>>> JSON:
> >>>>    { "Location" : {
> >>>>      "propertyName" : "location",
> >>>>      "value" : "Hennepin Technical College",
> >>>>      "sourceFormat" : "dc",
> >>>>      "mappingType" : "exact",
> >>>>      "locationLabel" : "Hennepin Technical College",
> >>>>      "longitude" : 0,
> >>>>      "latitude" : 0,
> >>>>      "altitude" : 0,
> >>>>      "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>      }
> >>>>
> >>>> RDF:
> >>>> <ma:createdIn>
> >>>>    <ma:Location>
> >>>>      <ma:locationName>
> >>>>        Hennepin Technical College
> >>>>      </ma:locationName>
> >>>>    </ma:Location>
> >>>> </ma:createdIn>
> >>>>
> >>>> Since there is no information about longitude, latitude, and
> >>>> altitude in RDF available, I suggest to remove these attributes in
> >>>> the corresponding JSON result set as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Keyword:
> >>>> JSON:
> >>>>   { "Keyword" : {
> >>>>      "propertyName" : "keyword",
> >>>>      "value" : "Dublin Core Meta Tags",
> >>>>      "language" : "en",
> >>>>      "sourceFormat" : "dc",
> >>>>      "mappingType" : "exact",
> >>>>      "keywordLabel" : "Dublin Core Meta Tags",
> >>>>      "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>      }
> >>>> RDF:
> >>>> <ma:hasKeyword rdf:parseType="Resource">
> >>>>    <rdfs:label>
> >>>>      Dublin Core Meta Tags
> >>>>    </rdfs:label>
> >>>> </ma:hasKeyword>
> >>>>
> >>>> There is no language information about keyword in RDF, therefore I
> >>>> would suggest to remove the language attribute in the JSON result
> >>> set.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Copyright
> >>>> JSON
> >>>>   { "Copyright" : {
> >>>>      "propertyName" : "copyright",
> >>>>      "value" : "Copyright 2007, Alan Kelsey, Ltd. All rights
> >>> reserved.",
> >>>>      "sourceFormat" : "dc",
> >>>>      "mappingType" : "related",
> >>>>      "copyrightLabel" : "Copyright 2007, Alan Kelsey, Ltd. All
> >>>> rights reserved.",
> >>>>      "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>      }
> >>>> RDF:
> >>>> <ma:isCopyrightedBy>
> >>>>    <ma:Organisation>
> >>>>      <rdfs:label
> >>> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">
> >>>>       Copyright 2007, Alan Kelsey, Ltd. All rights reserved.
> >>>>      </rdfs:label>
> >>>>    </ma:Organisation>
> >>>> </ma:isCopyrightedBy>
> >>>>
> >>>> DC:
> >>>> <dc:rights>
> >>>>   Copyright 2007, Alan Kelsey, Ltd. All rights reserved.
> >>>> </dc:rights>
> >>>>
> >>>> ma:isCopyrightedBy is used to describe the copyright holder not
> the
> >>>> copyright itself (copyrightLabel in JSON). Corresponding JSON
> >>>> attribute for ma:isCopyrightedBy is holderLabel.
> >>>> Moreover, a copyright.holder is optional, whereas copyright is
> >>>> required
> >>>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-mediaont-10-20120209/#core-
> property-
> >>>> lists).
> >>>> To solve this issue I suggest to turn the existing
> >>>> ma:isCopyrightedBy relation into a ma:copyright relation in RDF
> like this:
> >>>>
> >>>> <ma:copyright>Copyright 2007, Alan Kelsey, Ltd. All rights
> >>>> reserved.</ma:copyright>
> >>>>
> >>>> Another possible solution would be to split the orginal DC data
> >>>> about rights into 2 different RDF relations (ma:rights and
> >>>> ma:isCopyrightedBy).
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> My comments about the youtube JSON result document should be
> >>> available
> >>>> next Monday.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Martin
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>>>> Von: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> >>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Juni 2012 12:41
> >>>>> An: Höffernig, Martin
> >>>>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> >>>>> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [ACTION-472] Compile list of status code
> >>> issues
> >>>> /
> >>>>> additional issues
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Martin,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OK it seems there are inconsistencies between the TTL, RDF and
> XML
> >>>>> examples.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The TTL files are informative only.
> >>>>> The RDF files are normative and serves as the input to the API
> >>>>> outputting JSON Responses.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Therefore RDF and JSON Files MUST be in Synch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> for example, let see this for the EBUCore tests
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The XMl is incorrect (should not list VENEZUELA location) The RDF
> >>> is
> >>>>> correct ( lists only VENEZUELA location) The TTL is correct (
> >>>>> lists only VENEZUELA location) The JSON is incorrect (should not
> >>>>> list VENEZUELA location)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> see explanation following.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> the EBUCore XML
> >>>>> ---------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/
> >>> EB
> >>>>> U
> >>>>> CoreXML_ITM528229_extended.xml
> >>>>>    ...
> >>>>> <coverage><spatial><location
> >>>>> typeLink="cptype:city"><name>CARACAS</name></location><location
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> typeLink="cptype:country"><name>VENEZUELA</name><code>country:VE</co
> >>> de
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> </location></spatial></coverage>
> >>>>>    ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --> It provides the "VENEZUELA" location and the "CARACAS"
> >>>>> --> location
> >>>>>
> >>>>> the EBUCore RDF
> >>>>> ---------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/
> >>> EB
> >>>>> U
> >>>>> CoreXML_ITM528229_extended.owl
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    ...
> >>>>> <rdf:Description rdf:about="EBUNMSCityCode:CARACAS"><rdf:type
> >>>>> rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/ma-ont#Location"/><rdfs:label
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">CARACAS</rdfs
> >>> :l
> >>>>> a
> >>>>> bel></rdf:Description>
> >>>>>    ...
> >>>>> --> It does not provide the "VENEZUELA" location, only the
> >>> "CARACAS"
> >>>>> location
> >>>>>
> >>>>> the EBUCore TTL
> >>>>> ---------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/
> >>> EB
> >>>>> U
> >>>>> CoreXML_ITM528229_extended.ttl
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    ...
> >>>>> <EBUNMSCityCode:CARACAS>
> >>>>>         a       ma-ont:Location ;
> >>>>>         rdfs:label
> >>>> "CARACAS"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
> >>>>> .
> >>>>>    ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --> It does not provide the "VENEZUELA" location, only the
> >>> "CARACAS"
> >>>>> location
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> the EBUCore JSON
> >>>>> ---------------
> >>>>>    ...
> >>>>>    { "Location" : {
> >>>>>         "propertyName" : "location",
> >>>>>         "value" : "CARACAS",
> >>>>>         "language" : "English",
> >>>>>          "sourceFormat" : "ebucore",
> >>>>>         "mappingType" : "exact",
> >>>>>         "locationLabel" : "CARACAS",
> >>>>>          "longitude" : 0,
> >>>>>          "latitude" : 0,
> >>>>>         "altitude" : 0,
> >>>>>          "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>>          }
> >>>>>        },
> >>>>>        { "Location" : {
> >>>>>         "propertyName" : "location",
> >>>>>          "value" : "VENEZUELA",
> >>>>>         "language" : "English",
> >>>>>          "sourceFormat" : "ebucore",
> >>>>>          "mappingType" : "exact",
> >>>>>          "locationLabel" : "VENEZUELA",
> >>>>>         "longitude" : 0,
> >>>>>          "latitude" : 0,
> >>>>>          "altitude" : 0,
> >>>>>          "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>>          }
> >>>>>       },
> >>>>>    ...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --> It provides the "VENEZUELA" location and the "CARACAS"
> >>>>> --> location
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Le 12/06/2012 11:49, Höffernig, Martin a écrit :
> >>>>>> Thierry,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> please note that I assume that the corresponding ontology
> >>> document
> >>>>> only - not the original metadata example - is the basis for
> >>> creating
> >>>>> JSON response data sets for a given format.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> see my comments in-line.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>>>>>> Von: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> >>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 11. Juni 2012 16:04
> >>>>>>> An: Höffernig, Martin
> >>>>>>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: AW: [ACTION-472] Compile list of status code
> issues
> >>>>>>> / additional issues
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Martin,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I would like to focus first on the DC and Youtube formats as
> >>>>>>> these are the 2 formats we use for the implementation report.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But indeed we should fix the other formats and have the JSON
> >>>>>>> responses in Synch.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I am not sure I understand all the issue raised.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> See my responses in line ...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thierry
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Le 11/06/2012 14:27, Höffernig, Martin a écrit :
> >>>>>>>> Dear Thierry, all,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> here is an incomplete list of issues regarding category 3:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> EBUCore:
> >>>>>>>> Location - 2 location data sets in JSON response, only 1
> >>>>>>>> location present in ontology
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Not sure what the issue is. Both seem to have 2 occurences:
> >>>>>>> the EBUCore XML
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/
> >>>>> E
> >>>>>>> BU
> >>>>>>> CoreXML_ITM528229_extended.xml
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> <coverage><spatial><location
> >>>>>>> typeLink="cptype:city"><name>CARACAS</name></location><location
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> typeLink="cptype:country"><name>VENEZUELA</name><code>country:VE</co
> >>>>> d
> >>>>>>> e>
> >>>>>>> </location></spatial></coverage> ...
> >>>>>>> and the JSON
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> { "Location" : {
> >>>>>>>        "propertyName" : "location",
> >>>>>>>        "value" : "CARACAS",
> >>>>>>>        "language" : "English",
> >>>>>>>        "sourceFormat" : "ebucore",
> >>>>>>>        "mappingType" : "exact",
> >>>>>>>        "locationLabel" : "CARACAS",
> >>>>>>>        "longitude" : 0,
> >>>>>>>        "latitude" : 0,
> >>>>>>>        "altitude" : 0,
> >>>>>>>        "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>>>>        }
> >>>>>>>      },
> >>>>>>>      { "Location" : {
> >>>>>>>        "propertyName" : "location",
> >>>>>>>        "value" : "VENEZUELA",
> >>>>>>>        "language" : "English",
> >>>>>>>        "sourceFormat" : "ebucore",
> >>>>>>>        "mappingType" : "exact",
> >>>>>>>        "locationLabel" : "VENEZUELA",
> >>>>>>>        "longitude" : 0,
> >>>>>>>        "latitude" : 0,
> >>>>>>>        "altitude" : 0,
> >>>>>>>        "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>>>>        }
> >>>>>>>      },
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes that's correct. However, in the corresponding ontology
> >>> example
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> (http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats
> >>> /E
> >>>>> B
> >>>>> UCoreXML_ITM528229_extended.ttl) only 1 location has been
> >>> described,
> >>>>> namely EBUNMSCityCode:CARACAS (see below).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> <tag:ebu.ch,2011:528229>
> >>>>>>         ma-ont:createdIn<EBUNMSCityCode:CARACAS>  ;
> >>>>>>         ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> <EBUNMSCityCode:CARACAS>
> >>>>>>         a       ma-ont:Location ;
> >>>>>>         rdfs:label
> >>>>> "CARACAS"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>  .
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Therefore, as the ontology document serves as the basis for the
> >>>> JSON
> >>>>> response, only CARACAS can be part of the JSON result set.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> NamedFragment - NamedFragements in JSON, however no
> >>>>>>>> ma:hasNamedFragment relations in ontology
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> the EBUCore XML
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats/
> >>>>> E
> >>>>>>> BU
> >>>>>>> CoreXML_ITM528229_extended.xml
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> in the Ontlogy exact mapping from
> >>>>>>> namedFragment      to      hasPart
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Since there are no ma:hasNamedFragments relation in the ontology
> >>>>> example, no NamedFragments can be part of the JSON result.
> >>>>> However, ma:hasFragment relations exist, Fragment properties -
> not
> >>>>> NamedFragments - can be retrieved and part of the JSON response.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Locator - property has been mixed up with Location, contains
> >>> the
> >>>>>>>> same data
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Exif:
> >>>>>>>> FrameSize -  JSON contains 2 FrameSize data sets for same
> media
> >>>>>>>> resource, one FrameSize should refer to related thumbnail
> image
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Right the second relates to the thumbnail.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ID3:
> >>>>>>>> Contributor - roleLabels for Contributor (e.g. "TCOM
> Composer")
> >>>>>>>> not present in ontology
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In the ID3 ontology example
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> (http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats
> >>> /I
> >>>>> D
> >>>>> 3_bach.ttl) there is no further role information about
> >>> contributors,
> >>>>> formalized as sub properties, available.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> LOM 2.1:
> >>>>>>>> FrameSize - present in JSON, no data available in ontology
> >>>>>>>> Duration
> >>>>>>>> - same issue
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Not sure what the issue is:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ma:frameSize       more general mapping to "size"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> lom example:
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> <technical><size>1000</size>
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> lom Json:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>      { "FrameSize" : {
> >>>>>>>        "propertyName" : "frameSize",
> >>>>>>>        "value" : "1000",
> >>>>>>>        "language" : "English",
> >>>>>>>        "sourceFormat" : "lom21",
> >>>>>>>        "mappingType" : "more general",
> >>>>>>>        "width" : 0,
> >>>>>>>        "height" : 0,
> >>>>>>>        "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>>>>        }
> >>>>>>>      },
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ma:duration  is exact mapping to duration
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> there seems to be a bug here in the Lom example: the duration
> is
> >>>> in
> >>>>> a
> >>>>>>> comment:
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> <!--duration><duration>1H</duration>
> >>>>>>>      </duration-->
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Lom Json:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The duration value set to zero seems wrong (should be one hour)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>     { "Duration" : {
> >>>>>>>        "propertyName" : "duration",
> >>>>>>>        "language" : "English",
> >>>>>>>        "sourceFormat" : "lom21",
> >>>>>>>        "fragmentIdentifier" : "exact",
> >>>>>>>        "duration" : 0,
> >>>>>>>        "statusCode" : 204
> >>>>>>>        }
> >>>>>>>      },
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In the LOM ontology example
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> (http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats
> >>> /L
> >>>>> O
> >>>>> M_sample_v1.ttl) there is no data about frame size as well as
> >>>> duration.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Media RSS:
> >>>>>>>> Copyright - holderLink present in JSON, no information
> >>> available
> >>>>>>>> in ontology
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Not sure what the issue is:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ma:copyright       exact mapping to
> >>>>>>> "rss/channel/item/media:content/media:copyright"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> MediaRSS example:
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> <media:copyright url="http://blah.com/additional-
> info.html">2005
> >>>>>>> FooBar Media</media:copyright>  ...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> MediaRSS Json:
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>      { "Copyright" : {
> >>>>>>>        "propertyName" : "copyright",
> >>>>>>>        "value" : "2005 FooBar Media",
> >>>>>>>        "language" : "en",
> >>>>>>>        "sourceFormat" : "mrss",
> >>>>>>>        "mappingType" : "exact",
> >>>>>>>        "copyrightLabel" : "2005 FooBar Media",
> >>>>>>>        "holderLink" : "http://blah.com/additional-info.html",
> >>>>>>>        "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>>>>        }
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> There is no ma:copyright relation in the corresponding ontology
> >>>>> document
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> (http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats
> >>> /m
> >>>>> r
> >>>>> ss_sample_rdf.ttl ).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> TV-Anytime:
> >>>>>>>> TargetAudience - multiple targetAudience result sets present
> in
> >>>>>>>> JSON, only 1 target audience in ontology
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Not sure what the issue is:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ma:targetAudience  related mapping to "Genre"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> TVA  example:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> <Genre
> >>>>>>> href="urn:tva:metadata:cs:ContentCS:2005:3.1.1.1"><Name>Daily
> >>>>>>> news</Name></Genre><Genre
> >>>>>>>
> href="urn:tva:metadata:cs:ContentCS:2005:3.1.1.13"><Name>Weather
> >>>>>>> forecasts</Name></Genre><Genre
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> href="urn:tva:metadata:cs:FormatCS:2005:2.1.1"><Name>Bulletin</Name>
> >>>>> <
> >>>>>>> /G
> >>>>>>> enre><Genre
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> href="urn:tva:metadata:cs:IntentionCS:2005:1.2"><Name>INFORM</Name><
> >>>>> /
> >>>>>>> Ge
> >>>>>>> nre><Genre
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> href="urn:tva:metadata:cs:ContentCS:2005:3.1.1.9"><Name>Sports</Name
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> </
> >>>>>>> Genre>
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> TVA  Json:
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> { "TargetAudience" : {
> >>>>>>>        "propertyName" : "targetAudience",
> >>>>>>>        "value" : "Weather forecasts",
> >>>>>>>        "language" : "EN-UK",
> >>>>>>>        "sourceFormat" : "tva",
> >>>>>>>        "mappingType" : "related",
> >>>>>>>        "audienceLink" :
> >>>>> "urn:tva:metadata:cs:ContentCS:2005:3.1.1.13",
> >>>>>>>        "audienceLabel" : "Weather forecasts",
> >>>>>>>        "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>>>>        }
> >>>>>>>      },
> >>>>>>>      { "TargetAudience" : {
> >>>>>>>        "propertyName" : "targetAudience",
> >>>>>>>        "value" : "Bulletin",
> >>>>>>>        "language" : "EN-UK",
> >>>>>>>        "sourceFormat" : "tva",
> >>>>>>>        "mappingType" : "related",
> >>>>>>>        "audienceLink" :
> >>> "urn:tva:metadata:cs:FormatCS:2005:2.1.1",
> >>>>>>>        "audienceLabel" : "Bulletin",
> >>>>>>>        "statusCode" : 200
> >>>>>>>        }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Only 1 ma:TargetAudience instance in ontology docoument
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> (http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/metadata_formats
> >>> /T
> >>>>> V AXML_2_MAONTRDF_20100914BBCNewsTF_pl_pi_prog22_extended.ttl )
> >>>>> available.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Since my list is incomplete, more sync issues are potentially
> >>>>>>> possible. Therefore I suggest to fully revise the JSON files
> and
> >>>>>>> update these files w.r.t the unchanged ontology files.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>> Martin
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >>>>>>>>> Von: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> >>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 11. Juni 2012 12:21
> >>>>>>>>> An: tmichel@w3.org
> >>>>>>>>> Cc: Höffernig, Martin; public-media-annotation@w3.org;
> Bailer,
> >>>>>>> Werner
> >>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: [ACTION-472] Compile list of status code issues
> /
> >>>>>>>>> additional issues
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Remains now the third category that we may want to naildown
> >>>>>>>>> before going to PR
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>     >   I made the observation
> >>>>>>>>>     >   that some JSON response documents are not in sync
> with
> >>>> the>
> >>>>>>>>> corresponding ontology examples.
> >>>>>>>>>     >
> >>>>>>>>>     >   Therefore, MediaAnnotation objects include data which
> >>> are
> >>>>> not>
> >>>>>>>>> present in the corresponding ontology document.
> >>>>>>>>>     >
> >>>>>>>>>     >   I thought that the ontology documents should be the
> >>> basis
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> JSON>   responses?
> >>>>>>>>>     >
> >>>>>>>>>     >   Concerning formats:
> >>>>>>>>>     >
> >>>>>>>>>     >   EBUCore, Exif, ID3, LOM, MediaRSS, TV-Anytime
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Could you precise which data are out of sync ?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How should we resolve it:
> >>>>>>>>> Should we update the output (the JSON Files) or the input
> >>>>>>>>> (example and the RDF files in the Ontology testsuite?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> thierry
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Le 11/06/2012 11:55, Thierry MICHEL a écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>> Martin,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> With the previous publication of your updated JSON files, I
> >>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>> also updated these with the proper status code 200, as
> >>>> requested
> >>>>>>> bellow.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This should now close the issue for the category 1 and 2.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> thierry.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Le 05/06/2012 12:52, Höffernig, Martin a écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Dear all,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I have reviewed the API status codes [1] in the normative
> >>>>>>>>>>> JSON files of the testsuite implementation [2] and I found
> >>>>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>> issues
> >>>>>>>>>>> that should be addressed.
> >>>>>>>>>>> All of these issues are related to the usage of status code
> >>>> 206
> >>>>>>>>>>> (partial content).
> >>>>>>>>>>> For me, 206 is misused in many cases since its semantics is
> >>>>>>>>>>> possibly not quite clear.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I think, 206 should be returned in cases where only partial
> >>>>>>>>>>> data
> >>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>> available data for a media resource is returned.
> >>>>>>>>>>> For example, when requesting the FrameSize property and
> >>>>>>>>>>> Height
> >>>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>>>>> be returned only, while data about Width is available as
> >>> well
> >>>>>>>>>>> should result in status code 206.
> >>>>>>>>>>> On the other side, when retrieving a location property for
> >>>>>>>>>>> which the name of the location (locationLabel) is available
> >>>>>>>>>>> only - further information like latitude and longitude is
> >>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>> available
> >>>>>>>>>>> - I suggest to return status code 200 (OK), since all the
> >>>>>>>>>>> available information will be returned.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Taken my interpretation of the usage of satus code 206 into
> >>>>>>>>>>> account, I suggest to change the status code 206 to 200 in
> >>>>>>>>>>> for the following MediaAnnotation objects:
> >>>>>>>>>>> DIG35:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Location, Copyright
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> DublinCore:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Contributor, MADate, Location, Relation, Copyright
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> EBUCore:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Locator, Location, Creator, Relation, TargetAudience,
> >>>>>>>>> NamendFragment,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Fragment, FrameSize
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Exif:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Copyright, FrameSize
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ID3:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Contributor
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> YouTube:
> >>>>>>>>>>> TargetAudience
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> IPTC:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Location, Copyright, Policy, TargetAudience, Fragment,
> >>>>>>>>>>> FrameSize
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> LOM 2.1:
> >>>>>>>>>>> FrameSize
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Media RSS:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Location, Rating, Copyright, Policy, FrameSize
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> TV-Anytime:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Relation, TargetAudience
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> TXFeed:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Copyright
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> XMP:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Contributor, Creator, MADate, Location, Rating, Relation,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Copyright, Policy
> >>>>>>>>>> Done.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> YouTube:
> >>>>>>>>>>> TargetAudience
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> already Done from above.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, I suggest that in a JSON response,
> >>>> MediaAnnotation
> >>>>>>>>>>> objects should only contain attributes with associated
> >>> values.
> >>>>>>>>>>> For example, in the following MediaAnnotation object, the
> >>>>>>>>>>> attributes language, fragmentIdentifer, typeLink, and
> >>>> typeLabel
> >>>>>>>>>>> should be removed, since no value is available for these
> >>>>>>> attributes.
> >>>>>>>>>>> { "Title" : {
> >>>>>>>>>>> "propertyName" : "title",
> >>>>>>>>>>> "value" : "Oasis Concert Stage @ I Am A Walrus", "language"
> >>> :
> >>>>> "",
> >>>>>>>>>>> "sourceFormat" : "dig35", "fragmentIdentifier" : "",
> >>>>> "mappingType"
> >>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>>> "exact", "titleLabel" : "Oasis Concert Stage @ I Am A
> >>>>>>>>>>> Walrus", "typeLink" : "", "typeLabel" : "", "statusCode" :
> >>>>>>>>>>> 200 }
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This issue applies to many MediaAnnotation objects in
> >>>> following
> >>>>>>>>>>> documents:
> >>>>>>>>>>> DIG35, Dublin Core, EBUCore, Exif, ID3, IPTC, LOM,
> MediaRSS,
> >>>>> DMS-
> >>>>>>> 1,
> >>>>>>>>>>> TV-Anytime, TXFeed, XMP, YouTube
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Moreover, while examining the status codes, I made the
> >>>>>>>>>>> observation that some JSON response documents are not in
> >>> sync
> >>>>>>>>>>> with the corresponding ontology examples.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, MediaAnnotation objects include data which are
> >>> not
> >>>>>>>>> present
> >>>>>>>>>>> in the corresponding ontology document.
> >>>>>>>>>>> I thought that the ontology documents should be the basis
> >>> for
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> JSON responses?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Concerning formats:
> >>>>>>>>>>> EBUCore, Exif, ID3, LOM, MediaRSS, TV-Anytime
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-mediaont-api-1.0-
> 20111122/#api-
> >>>>>>> status-
> >>>>>>>>> co
> >>>>>>>>>>> des
> >>>>>>>>>>> [2]:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/wiki/TestSuite_implement
> >>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>> tion
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hope my observation scan help to improve the JSON
> documents.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Martin
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Martin Höffernig
> >>>>>>>>>>> Audiovisual Media Group
> >>>>>>>>>>> DIGITAL - Institute for Information and Communication
> >>>>>>>>>>> Technologies
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH Steyrergasse
> >>> 17,
> >>>>>>>>>>> 8010 Graz, AUSTRIA
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> phone: +43-316-876-1184
> >>>>>>>>>>> general fax: +43-316-876-1191
> >>>>>>>>>>> web: http://www.joanneum.at/digital
> >>>>>>>>>>> e-mail:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>
> martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at<mailto:martin.hoeffernig@joanneum.at>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> >
> >
Received on Monday, 25 June 2012 12:37:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 25 June 2012 12:37:39 GMT