W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

Re: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW

From: Courtney Kennedy <ckennedy@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:57:38 -0700
Cc: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, 'Silvia Pfeiffer' <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>, "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-id: <7BD7EEF7-4171-4BB4-B92D-587ED3E4B243@apple.com>
To: tmichel@w3.org
Hi Thierry,

Here is the information you asked for.

1. For QuickTime, the entry for Examples in both tables 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 should be the same.  
Please use the following for the Examples column, for QuickTime, in both tables:

qt:  com.apple.quicktime.author

2.  For QuickTime, the link in the reference column in both tables 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 goes to section 5.2.2.14.  For all the other formats the link in this column goes to the entry for that format in the A References ( Normative ) section.  Could you change the reference link for QuickTime to point to the QuickTime entry in that section as well?

3.   For MP4, please use the following entry for the Examples column:

mp4: udta/cprt

Note: it looks like most examples are for the Creator metadata key.  MP4 does not have a definition for Creator.  Copyright is really the only descriptive metadata defined for MP4.

4.  For 3gp, please the following entry for the Examples column:

3gp: udta/auth

Best Regards,
Courtney


On May 10, 2011, at 3:44 AM, Thierry MICHEL wrote:

> Courtney, David, Sylvia,
> 
> Could you please send a short example (see bellow) just like we have done for the Multimedia formats in scope,
> see in the Example column of this table
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediaont-1.0.html#metadata-formats-in-scope
> 
> Le 10/05/2011 09:06, Bailer, Werner a écrit :
>> Dear Thierry,
>> 
>> Thanks for your updates.
>> 
>>>>    - examples in Table 1.1.2 are missing
> 
>> The example column in the container formats table is empty, I think we should have examples there just as in the metadata formats table.
> 
> Right we need an example for each of these Multimedia container formats in scope in this table
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediaont-1.0.html#container-formats-in-scope
> 
> 
> 3gp	Courtney /David
> flv	Thierry
> qt	Courtney /David
> mp4	Courtney /David
> ogg	Silvia
> webm	Silvia
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Werner
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
>>> Sent: Montag, 09. Mai 2011 20:03
>>> To: Bailer, Werner
>>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>> Subject: Re: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le 09/05/2011 16:33, Bailer, Werner a écrit :
>>>> Dear Thierry, all,
>>>> 
>>>> Here are some comments on the draft CR version.
>>>> 
>>>> - status section
>>>>    - typo: convinience ->   convenience
>>> 
>>> -->  Updated
>>>> 
>>>> - introduction:
>>>>    - "... types of mappings: exact, broader or narrower." The tables
>>> actually use the terms "exact", "more specific", "more generic" and
>>> "related"
>>> -->  Updated
>>>>    - "with the Dublin Core" ->   "with Dublin Core"
>>> -->  Updated
>>>>    - examples in Table 1.1.2 are missing
>>> 
>>> -->  ???
>>>> 
>>>> - property definitions
>>>>    - "The resulting set of properties is nearly identical to that
>>> chosen by the [jpsearch] initiative."  - 1. Is this still the case
>>> after all the changes ?  2. Do we want to stress this fact before even
>>> listing the properties?
>>> 
>>> -->  @@ Not done. to be discussed.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>    - title: double quotation mark after String
>>> -->  Updated
>>> 
>>>>    - location: maybe mention http://www.epsg-registry.org/ as a
>>> registry of coordinate reference systems (which can be used to identify
>>> coordinate systems by URIs)
>>> -->  Updated
>>>> - mapping tables
>>>>    - Dublin core: "similar" is used instead of "related"
>>>>    - EBU Core: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is
>>> also used
>>>>    - IPTC: the table should have NewsML-G2 in the title
>>>>    - IPTC: "similar" is used instead of "related"
>>>>    - MPEG-7: numTracks: the how to text should be changed to
>>> "AudioChannel maps to numTracks of an audio track. For a media
>>> resource, the number of video and audio channels can be determined from
>>> the number of parallel tracks being described"
>>>>    - TV Anytime: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is
>>> also used
>>>>    - F4V: "usually exact" is used
>>> 
>>> -->  All mapping table updated
>>>> 
>>>> - examples
>>>>    - there is<span><tt>   markup in sections 6.4 and 6.5
>>> 
>>> Right the Tool deoes not like<span>. I have to investigate. Or will
>>> change manually the HTML output ;-(
>>>> 
>>>> - ontology
>>>>    - there is an indentation of the 1st line in both the XML and TTL
>>> representation
>>> 
>>> Right the Tool does not like something here. I have to investigate. Or
>>> will change manually the HTML output ;-(
>>>> 
>>>> - references
>>>>    - shouldn't XML schema data types, RDF and OWL2 be among the
>>> normative ones?
>>>>    - HTML5: reference a more recent draft?
>>>>    - TTML should probably be normative, as all the other mapped
>>> formats are
>>> 
>>> -->  All mapping table updated
>>> 
>>> 
>>> see updates
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediao
>>> nt-1.0.html
>>> 
>>> and in the dev space
>>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Werner
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
>>>>> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
>>>>> Sent: Montag, 09. Mai 2011 10:05
>>>>> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>>>> Subject: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW
>>>>> 
>>>>> MAWG Participants,
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> This will be the last chance to review the Ontology for Media
>>> Resources
>>>>> 1.0 [CR version to be reviewed] [1]
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please have a deep review of this document.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have added in the "Status of this Document" the CR exit criteria.
>>>>> Please review these carefully and we will discuss it in oour call
>>>>> tomorrow.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Next week we will probably vote to move it to CR.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thierry
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> 
>>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediao
>>>>> nt-1.0.html
>>>> 
> 


______________________________________________
Courtney Kennedy 408.974.3386, mobile: 408.771.8615
Engineering Manager,  Media Formats
Apple, Inc.

APPLE CONFIDENTIAL
This message (including attachments if any) is for the private use of the addressee only and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you have received this message by mistake please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachments from your system. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of this message, and any attachments in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 20:58:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 May 2011 20:58:07 GMT