W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > May 2011

Re: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 12:44:24 +0200
Message-ID: <4DC91708.7030306@w3.org>
To: "Bailer, Werner" <werner.bailer@joanneum.at>, Courtney Kennedy <ckennedy@apple.com>, 'Silvia Pfeiffer' <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, Dave Singer <singer@apple.com>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Courtney, David, Sylvia,

Could you please send a short example (see bellow) just like we have 
done for the Multimedia formats in scope,
see in the Example column of this table

http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediaont-1.0.html#metadata-formats-in-scope

Le 10/05/2011 09:06, Bailer, Werner a écrit :
> Dear Thierry,
>
> Thanks for your updates.
>
>>>     - examples in Table 1.1.2 are missing

> The example column in the container formats table is empty, I think we should have examples there just as in the metadata formats table.

Right we need an example for each of these Multimedia container formats 
in scope in this table
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediaont-1.0.html#container-formats-in-scope


3gp	Courtney /David
flv	Thierry
qt	Courtney /David
mp4	Courtney /David
ogg	Silvia
webm	Silvia












>
> Best regards,
> Werner
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
>> Sent: Montag, 09. Mai 2011 20:03
>> To: Bailer, Werner
>> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW
>>
>>
>>
>> Le 09/05/2011 16:33, Bailer, Werner a écrit :
>>> Dear Thierry, all,
>>>
>>> Here are some comments on the draft CR version.
>>>
>>> - status section
>>>     - typo: convinience ->   convenience
>>
>> -->  Updated
>>>
>>> - introduction:
>>>     - "... types of mappings: exact, broader or narrower." The tables
>> actually use the terms "exact", "more specific", "more generic" and
>> "related"
>> -->  Updated
>>>     - "with the Dublin Core" ->   "with Dublin Core"
>> -->  Updated
>>>     - examples in Table 1.1.2 are missing
>>
>> -->  ???
>>>
>>> - property definitions
>>>     - "The resulting set of properties is nearly identical to that
>> chosen by the [jpsearch] initiative."  - 1. Is this still the case
>> after all the changes ?  2. Do we want to stress this fact before even
>> listing the properties?
>>
>> -->  @@ Not done. to be discussed.
>>
>>
>>>     - title: double quotation mark after String
>> -->  Updated
>>
>>>     - location: maybe mention http://www.epsg-registry.org/ as a
>> registry of coordinate reference systems (which can be used to identify
>> coordinate systems by URIs)
>> -->  Updated
>>> - mapping tables
>>>     - Dublin core: "similar" is used instead of "related"
>>>     - EBU Core: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is
>> also used
>>>     - IPTC: the table should have NewsML-G2 in the title
>>>     - IPTC: "similar" is used instead of "related"
>>>     - MPEG-7: numTracks: the how to text should be changed to
>> "AudioChannel maps to numTracks of an audio track. For a media
>> resource, the number of video and audio channels can be determined from
>> the number of parallel tracks being described"
>>>     - TV Anytime: "similar" is used instead of "related", "derived" is
>> also used
>>>     - F4V: "usually exact" is used
>>
>> -->  All mapping table updated
>>>
>>> - examples
>>>     - there is<span><tt>   markup in sections 6.4 and 6.5
>>
>> Right the Tool deoes not like<span>. I have to investigate. Or will
>> change manually the HTML output ;-(
>>>
>>> - ontology
>>>     - there is an indentation of the 1st line in both the XML and TTL
>> representation
>>
>> Right the Tool does not like something here. I have to investigate. Or
>> will change manually the HTML output ;-(
>>>
>>> - references
>>>     - shouldn't XML schema data types, RDF and OWL2 be among the
>> normative ones?
>>>     - HTML5: reference a more recent draft?
>>>     - TTML should probably be normative, as all the other mapped
>> formats are
>>
>> -->  All mapping table updated
>>
>>
>> see updates
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediao
>> nt-1.0.html
>>
>> and in the dev space
>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Werner
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-
>>>> annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
>>>> Sent: Montag, 09. Mai 2011 10:05
>>>> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>>>> Subject: CR version of the Ontlogy for REVIEW
>>>>
>>>> MAWG Participants,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This will be the last chance to review the Ontology for Media
>> Resources
>>>> 1.0 [CR version to be reviewed] [1]
>>>>
>>>> Please have a deep review of this document.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I have added in the "Status of this Document" the CR exit criteria.
>>>> Please review these carefully and we will discuss it in oour call
>>>> tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Next week we will probably vote to move it to CR.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thierry
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/CR/mediao
>>>> nt-1.0.html
>>>
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 10:44:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 10 May 2011 10:44:45 GMT