W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > June 2011

Re: Checked metadata examples and RDF files

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 14:00:49 +0200
Message-ID: <4DFB41F1.6080208@w3.org>
To: "Evain, Jean-Pierre" <evain@ebu.ch>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>

Jean Pierre,


OK I get it now, the email was missing the color for the wrong 'green' 
text as in the HTML page .

Please read:

Files marked in green are validated (RDF validated, XML well formed or 
TTL valid)
Files marked in red are not valid (RDF invalid, XML not well formed or 
TTL invalid))
Files marked in yellow can not be validated (binary files for example).


I must be the Daltonian ...

Thierry

Le 17/06/2011 13:41, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
> All marked in green ;-) is one greener than the other?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
> Sent: vendredi, 17. juin 2011 11:55
> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Checked metadata examples and RDF files
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have check the multimedia metadata formats from the testsuite
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>
> Status:
>
> - Files marked in green are validated (RDF validated or XML well formed)
> - Files marked in green are not valid (RDF valid or XML not well formed)
> - Files marked in green can not be validated (binary files for example)
>
>
> Missing Files
> *************
>
> We are still missing the following RDF files
> MRSS
> TXF
> Flash
>
> RDF Files invalid
> *****************
> EXIF_RDF
> QT_RDF
> 3GP_RDF
> MP4_RDF
>
>
> XML Files invalid
> *****************
> Cablelabbs ADI 1.1 Example
> IPTC_Example (empty file) please resend JP.
> TXF_Example
>
> TTL Files invalid
> ******************
> EXIF_TTL
> QT_TTL
> 3GP_TTL
> MP4_TTL
>
>
> Please send me your validated files.
>
>
>
>
> Note that the above only checks the syntax of the documents but not the
> completeness of the properties.
>
> We will have to manually check these file and probably assign reviewers.
>
> Thierry.
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> **************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it
> are confidential and intended solely for the
> use of the individual or entity to whom they
> are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error,
> please notify the system manager.
> This footnote also confirms that this email
> message has been swept by the mailgateway
> **************************************************
>
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 12:01:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:42 UTC