Re: Checked metadata examples and RDF files

?????

Are you looking at
http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html

did you reload ?

All the following files mentioned invalid are marked in red (at least in 
my Firefox !)

Le 17/06/2011 13:49, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
> No, in your mail you are only mentioning files marked in green ;-(
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thierry MICHEL [mailto:tmichel@w3.org]
> Sent: vendredi, 17. juin 2011 13:49
> To: Evain, Jean-Pierre
> Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Checked metadata examples and RDF files
>
> IS this a daltonian joke ?
>
> Your files are indeed all green except the XML IPTC_Example which is an
> empty file).
>
> Le 17/06/2011 13:41, Evain, Jean-Pierre a écrit :
>> All marked in green ;-) is one greener than the other?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
>> Sent: vendredi, 17. juin 2011 11:55
>> To: public-media-annotation@w3.org
>> Subject: Checked metadata examples and RDF files
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have check the multimedia metadata formats from the testsuite
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/testsuite.html
>>
>> Status:
>>
>> - Files marked in green are validated (RDF validated or XML well formed)
>> - Files marked in green are not valid (RDF valid or XML not well formed)
>> - Files marked in green can not be validated (binary files for example)
>>
>>
>> Missing Files
>> *************
>>
>> We are still missing the following RDF files
>> MRSS
>> TXF
>> Flash
>>
>> RDF Files invalid
>> *****************
>> EXIF_RDF
>> QT_RDF
>> 3GP_RDF
>> MP4_RDF
>>
>>
>> XML Files invalid
>> *****************
>> Cablelabbs ADI 1.1 Example
>> IPTC_Example (empty file) please resend JP.
>> TXF_Example
>>
>> TTL Files invalid
>> ******************
>> EXIF_TTL
>> QT_TTL
>> 3GP_TTL
>> MP4_TTL
>>
>>
>> Please send me your validated files.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Note that the above only checks the syntax of the documents but not the
>> completeness of the properties.
>>
>> We will have to manually check these file and probably assign reviewers.
>>
>> Thierry.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------------------
>> **************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it
>> are confidential and intended solely for the
>> use of the individual or entity to whom they
>> are addressed.
>> If you have received this email in error,
>> please notify the system manager.
>> This footnote also confirms that this email
>> message has been swept by the mailgateway
>> **************************************************
>>
>

Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 11:56:59 UTC