W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > February 2011

RE: ACTION ALL to review the Ontology spec before 2nd Last CAll

From: Evain, Jean-Pierre <evain@ebu.ch>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2011 12:38:47 +0100
To: "'tmichel@w3.org'" <tmichel@w3.org>, "mcsuarez@fi.upm.es" <mcsuarez@fi.upm.es>
CC: "public-media-annotation@w3.org" <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <7D1656F54141C042A1B2556AE5237D60010EAF92EF44@GVAMAIL.gva.ebu.ch>

This is the revision of the RDF with some additional annotation on the use of fragments and the associated hasFragment property. This was discussed off-line with Tobias and Pierre Antoine following a request for clarification from Mari-carmen. We believe these clarifications are useful e.g. to describe an image fragment.

Best regards,


-----Original Message-----
From: public-media-annotation-request@w3.org [mailto:public-media-annotation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Thierry MICHEL
Sent: mardi, 8. février 2011 12:16
To: mcsuarez@fi.upm.es
Cc: public-media-annotation@w3.org
Subject: Re: ACTION ALL to review the Ontology spec before 2nd Last CAll

Mari Carmen,

Thank you for your review.

I have update the spec as follows.


Le 04/02/2011 14:53, Mari Carmen Suárez de Figueroa Baonza a écrit :
> Dear Thierry, and all,
> here you can find my comments.
> abstract
> - a core set of descriptive properties: this document defines --> "a
> core set of descriptive properties. This document defines"

> introduction
> - in the following "properties of our Ontology was selected", 'our
> ontology' should be changed for 'Ontology for Media Resources 1.0'

> terminology
> - "Ontology definition": are not limited to using RDF: implementations
> MAY use --> are not limited to using RDF. Implementations MAY use

> - "Media resource definition": is any physical or logical Resource that
> can be --> is any physical or logical resource that can be

> acknowledgement
> - member list should be updated (maybe including also my name, if you
> consider it logic :-)).

Added your name
> General: (across the document)
> - The use of 'version 1.0' and '1.0' with respect to the Ontology for
> Media Resources should be unified along the text, because sometimes is
> used in the first form and other times in the latter one.

> - Some times ontology appears in lower case and other times starting
> with capital letter (e.g., second and third paragraph of the
> introduction), this should be unified (to be used always the same form).

I unified it. But is some cases the ontology should remain with a lower 
case, when it is use as a general case for ontology (not the Media 

> - It should be clarify explicitly that "Media Ontology" and "Ontology
> for Media Resources" are synonyms

Added in
2 Conformance Requirements

> - Different types of letters are used (e.g. for urls, see section 7.1).
> This should be unified.

Not sure what you mean ?

> Best Regards,
> Mari Carmen.
> Thierry MICHEL escribió:
>> Hi all,
>> Please review carefully the Ontology draft
>> http://dev.w3.org/2008/video/mediaann/mediaont-1.0/mediaont-1.0.html
>> This will be the *last chance* for edits before going to 2nd Last Call.
>> During the next MAWG telecon, the group will take the decision to move
>> to 2nd Last Call.
>> Please report to the mailing list your feedback.
>> Thierry.

Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 11:57:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:41 UTC