W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > August 2011

Re: Update on XMP

From: Thierry MICHEL <tmichel@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:42:59 +0200
Message-ID: <4E5E4873.8030402@w3.org>
To: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@dfki.de>
CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org

Le 31/08/2011 16:20, Felix Sasaki a écrit :
> Hi all,
> attached is an update of the XMP test suite file and the corresponding
> mapping table. Thierry, can you upload these?

Files Uploaded.
tessuite updated accordingly.


Ontology spec accordingly.

> I have followed the guidelines at
> http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Annotations/drafts/ontology10/Guidelines_for_ontology_examples
> and the DC example linked from the guidelines. I implemented the comments
> about XMP at
> http://www.w3.org/2011/06/28-mediaann-minutes.html
> Three mappings have no example in the RDF file: ma:relation to DerivedFrom,
> History and Ingredients from the xmpMM namespace.


> About the comments from Antoine archived at
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-media-annotation/2011Aug/0002.html
>>> For ex I read in the latter: xmpDM:copyright is Deprecated in favour of
>>> dc:rights.
>>> I don't find it in http://www.w3.org/TR/mediaont-10/#xmp-
>>> table, but it's before in the doc.
>>> More important, xmpRights:UsageTerms seems to have disappeared from
>>> And xmpRights:webStatement is now xmpDM:webStatement in some part of
>>> the XMP doc, but xmpRights:webStatement in others. In fact it is very
>>> unclear to me what the correct thing is (except that xmpRights: is not
>>> formally defined in the doc, as a self-standing namespace).
> I would leave this to the group to decide whether they want to make another
> loop with Adobe about this. After all Adobe has to say what is adequate
> here.

Could you ask your contact at Adobe to check this issue ?

> Felix
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2011 14:42:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:17:43 UTC