Hi all, As per my Action-232, I reviewed the Use Cases document to check that excluding setter operations would not arm one of our UC too much. It seems to me that we can safely exclude setters for the first version of our specifications. They are identified as requirement r02, which has been appears only in two UC: - curltural heritage - user generated metadata and even in those use cases, it is never emphasized that the *setting* of metadata should be done through a generic API, independant from the underlying format. paReceived on Monday, 26 April 2010 20:24:25 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 26 April 2010 20:24:25 GMT