RE: mapping table 2.0

>This shows, in my (biased ;) opinion, that even "flat looking" metadata
>scheme involve several layers of abstraction, and so that our ontology
>must take this into account, preferably in an explicit way.

This makes me think that we should have a more complex ontology, with some fundamental entities that can resolve mappings from/to different levels of abstraction.

We already have that as a requirement:
Requirement r07: Introducing several abstraction levels in the ontology
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-media-annot-reqs-20090119/#req-r07


I would like to ask the group if there are any volunteers to start drafting such Ontology?

/Joakim