W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > April 2009

Re: second publication of the "Use Cases and Requirements for Ontology and API for Media Object 1.0" Draft.

From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:40:12 +0900
Message-ID: <ba4134970904281240h119c69ewd38dcfeeedb87b0a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>
Cc: Thierry Michel <tmichel@w3.org>, public-media-annotation@w3.org, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
2009/4/29 Florian Stegmaier <stegmai@dimis.fim.uni-passau.de>

> Hello everybody,
>
> i also agree in the publication of the use case document.
>
> But we should keep in mind for the next "planned changing" of it to add the
> note that the debate about the terminology (media entity vs. object and so
> on) is still ongoing (i think Felix suggested this solution in todays
> telecon).


Yes, I suggested that and will add that note to the draft.

Felix


> I think this should prevent us from (possibly) upcoming discussions.
>
> Best regards,
> Florian
>
>
> Am 28.04.2009 um 18:07 schrieb Thierry Michel:
>
>
>  Joakim,
>>
>> If there are no objections, that is enough.
>>
>> Thierry.
>>
>>
>> Joakim Söderberg wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> The following have given their approval for publication:
>>> Felix
>>> Wonsuk
>>> Werner
>>> Frank
>>> Pierre-Antoine
>>> Silvia
>>> Jean-Pierre
>>> Veronique
>>> Lawrence
>>> Tobias
>>> Chris
>>> Raphael
>>> Joakim
>>> - which corresponds to 54% of the participants. Is that enough for
>>> publishing on TR pages?
>>> /Joakim
>>>
>>>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 19:40:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 28 April 2009 19:40:55 GMT