W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2008

some extra (generic) UC's & some thoughts about XG

From: erik mannens <erik.mannens@telenet.be>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2008 23:08:42 +0200
To: <public-media-annotation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000601c91777$3b911240$b2b336c0$@mannens@telenet.be>
(more generic) use cases for the media ontology

===============================

..          multimedia search

o    classic facetted browsing (cfr. /facet [1])

o    software agents matching user preferences with media annotations (cfr.
[2])

o    matching/merging UC of Veronique Malaise in her mail last friday

..          multimedia adaptation

o    adapting multimedia streams on shot or scene level, based on its media
annotations (e.g., remove violent scenes which were indicated in the media
annotation)

o    Region Of Interest selection. Select only a specific region from the
frame/image, based on its media annotations

..          multimedia presentation

o    enhanced multimedia players (for example [3] and [4])

..          multimedia sharing

o    between different users

o    between different platforms (e.g., Flickr, Picasa, Webshots, ...)

..          tagging (cfr. MMSEM use case [5])

 

[1] Hildebrand et al.: <a
href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/d13t53k0022072t5/">/facet: A
browser for heterogeneous semantic web repositories</a>.

[2] Park et al. <a
href="http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/SAMSUNG.pdf">Video
Recommendation Based on User Preference on the Web</a>.

[3] http://www.viddler.com/

[4] http://www.viewzi.com

[5] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-interoperability/#tagging

 

 

Metadata standard description

===================

>From the MMSEM XG we could extract following strandards:

..          still images: VRA, Exif, DIG35, PhotoRDF

..          audio: ID3, MusicBrainz, MusicXML

..          audio/video: MPEG-7, AAF, MXF

..          presentations: SMIL, SVG

..          specific domains: NewsML, TVAnytime, P-Meta

..          other: Dublin Core, XMP, MPEG-21

 

We should "pick one metadata standard and pull out requirements, but not
tight to the XG document". There are not many other standards to be
elaborated on, right? It was the task of our XG to make an exhaustive
listing. Couldn't we start just using all these documents from the late
MMSEM XG (as Tobias already started)?

 

Some last thought 

============

..          we should not be too specific and also try to solve generic use
cases

 

 

Sincere greetings and 'till next week,

 

Davy & Erik

 

Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201

B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium

 

T: +32 9 331 49 93

F: +32 9 331 48 96

M: +32 473 27 44 17

 

http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be

 
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2008 04:38:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 October 2008 05:33:19 GMT