W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-media-annotation@w3.org > September 2008

Re: some extra (generic) UC's & some thoughts about XG

From: Véronique Malaisé <vmalaise@few.vu.nl>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:28:03 +0100
Message-ID: <48CF8A33.8070107@few.vu.nl>
CC: public-media-annotation@w3.org

erik mannens wrote:

> (more generic) use cases for the media ontology
>
> ===============================
>
> · multimedia search
>
> o classic facetted browsing (cfr. /facet [1])
>
> o software agents matching user preferences with media annotations 
> (cfr. [2])
>
> o matching/merging UC of Veronique Malaise in her mail last friday
>
Some references for this use case are the STITCH project 
(http://www.cs.vu.nl/STITCH/) and the Europeana project 
(http://www.europeana.eu/)

> · multimedia adaptation
>
> o adapting multimedia streams on shot or scene level, based on its 
> media annotations (e.g., remove violent scenes which were indicated in 
> the media annotation)
>
> o Region Of Interest selection. Select only a specific region from the 
> frame/image, based on its media annotations
>
> · multimedia presentation
>
> o enhanced multimedia players (for example [3] and [4])
>
> · multimedia sharing
>
> o between different users
>
> o between different platforms (e.g., Flickr, Picasa, Webshots, ...)
>
> · tagging (cfr. MMSEM use case [5])
>
> [1] Hildebrand et al.: <a 
> href="http://www..springerlink.com/content/d13t53k0022072t5/ 
> <http://www.springerlink.com/content/d13t53k0022072t5/>">/facet: A 
> browser for heterogeneous semantic web repositories</a>.
>
> [2] Park et al. <a 
> href="http://www..w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/SAMSUNG.pdf 
> <http://www.w3.org/2007/08/video/positions/SAMSUNG.pdf>">Video 
> Recommendation Based on User Preference on the Web</a>.
>
> [3] http://www.viddler.com/
>
> [4] http://www.viewzi.com
>
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/mmsem/XGR-interoperability/#tagging
>
> Metadata standard description
>
> ===================
>
> From the MMSEM XG we could extract following strandards:
>
> · still images: VRA, Exif, DIG35, PhotoRDF
>
I was having a look at the IPTC Standard for Photo Metadata, which has a 
stong overlap with NewsML, both sharing the controled vocabulary for 
(content and controlled) semantic annotation and a set of metadata 
features. I will send my document today to the list.

> · audio: ID3, MusicBrainz, MusicXML
>
> · audio/video: MPEG-7, AAF, MXF
>
> · presentations: SMIL, SVG
>
> · specific domains: NewsML, TVAnytime, P-Meta
>
> · other: Dublin Core, XMP, MPEG-21
>
> We should “pick one metadata standard and pull out requirements, but 
> not tight to the XG document”. There are not many other standards to 
> be elaborated on, right? It was the task of our XG to make an 
> exhaustive listing. Couldn’t we start just using all these documents 
> from the late MMSEM XG (as Tobias already started)?
>
> Some last thought
>
> ============
>
> · we should not be too specific and also try to solve generic use cases
>
> Sincere greetings and ‘till next week,
>
> Davy & Erik
>
> Gaston Crommenlaan 8 bus 201
>
> B-9050 Ledeberg-Ghent, Belgium
>
> T: +32 9 331 49 93
>
> F: +32 9 331 48 96
>
> M: +32 473 27 44 17
>
> http://multimedialab.elis.ugent.be
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2008 09:27:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 10 October 2008 05:33:19 GMT