- From: Antonino Lo Bue <lobue@pa.icar.cnr.it>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 19:28:21 -0000 (UTC)
- To: Martynas JuseviÄius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Cc: "Antonino Lo Bue" <lobue@pa.icar.cnr.it>, "public-lod" <public-lod@w3.org>, "Holger Knublauch" <holger@topquadrant.com>
Hi Martynas, yes I heard about RDF Data Shapes and I was wondering if it was still the case to use SPIN or try to experimentate that new stuff. The only shortage I see on SPIN is that is not so much broad used. Thanks Antonino > Hey Antonino, > > I don't know where you get your information from, but SPIN is the > flexible solution, as it gives you the full flexibility of SPARQL and > more. Not only for inferencing, but also for constraints, query > modelling etc. > > What are the alternatives you have in mind? > The "new thing" coming is probably W3C Data Shapes: > http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Main_Page > It will take some time before it becomes standard however, and > hopefully it will be based on SPIN anyway. > > > Martynas > graphityhq.com > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:33 PM, Antonino Lo Bue <lobue@pa.icar.cnr.it> > wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'm wondering if someone from the list could make a clear point on SPIN >> adoption and usage status. I'm planning to use it in my research work to >> model SPARQL inferencing on Open data->Linked open data workflows , but >> I >> have heard that something new is coming and would/could replace SPIN >> with >> a more flexible language. >> Is this the case and so I could risk to work with outdated and legacy >> stuff? Or do you encourage the adoption? >> >> Thanks and regards >> >> Antonino Lo Bue >> CNR-ICAR Palermo >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/antoninolobue >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 23 December 2014 09:55:02 UTC