- From: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 10:35:44 +0200
- To: Jonathan A Rees <rees@mumble.net>
- Cc: public-lod community <public-lod@w3.org>
hi all On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 05:53:03PM +0200, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: > maybe I made an error by assuming that the term IR is inherent in the term > representation - by assuming that a NIR cannot have a representation, only > descriptions ? No. The whole point about the use of the term IR in HR14 seems to be to say: Everything that has a representation has a representation that conveys it's essential characteristics. Is this important ? If yes, should we write it this way ? Regards, Michael Brunnbauer -- ++ Michael Brunnbauer ++ netEstate GmbH ++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a ++ 81379 München ++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80 ++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 ++ E-Mail brunni@netestate.de ++ http://www.netestate.de/ ++ ++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München) ++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342 ++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer ++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 08:36:10 UTC