- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 23:50:28 +0100
- To: public-lod@w3.org
On 7/12/11 11:33 PM, Thomas Steiner wrote: >> > (Linked Data and the LOD diagram is not about SPARQL endpoints) > Fair enough. It is related though, according to TimBL's Linked Data > principle #3 (http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html). > Really got to be careful there. SPARQL and RDF are implementation details re. Linked Data. Note, in the original Linked Data meme, point #3 read: When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information . As exemplified by this post and in many other conversations, the addition of: "using the standards (RDF*, SPARQL)" is a regressive update of a GOLDEN meme. Net effect has been to inject inertia into Linked Data's adoption curve. If you are seeking stats re. what I mean re. intertia, just keep track of what's happening on the schema.org front re. adoption curve. -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 22:50:57 UTC