W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2011

Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF

From: Yrjana Rankka <ghard@openlinksw.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:46:20 +0100
Message-ID: <4D37155C.7080200@openlinksw.com>
To: nathan@webr3.org
CC: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@GMAIL.COM>, Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@GMAIL.COM>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@W3.ORG>
On 1/19/11 16:59 , Nathan wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
>> Nathan,
>> If you are going to make claims about the effect of other
>> specifications on RDF, could you please include pointers to the parts
>> of specifications that you are referring to, ideally with illustrative
>> examples of the problems you are? Absent that it is too difficult to
>> evaluate your claims.
>> The conversations on such topics too often devolve into serial opinion
>> dumping. If this is to be at all productive we need to be as precise
>> as possible.
> Good idea :)
> I'll create a new page on the wiki and add some examples over the next 
> few days, then reply with a pointer later in the week.

> ps: as an illustration of how engrained URI normalization is, I've 
> capitalized the domain names in the to: and cc: fields, I do hope the 
> mail still come through, and hope that you'll accept this email as 
> being sent to you. Hopefully we'll also find this mail in the archives 
> shortly at htTp://lists.W3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2011Jan/ - 
> Personally I'd hope that any statements made using these URIs 
> (asserted by man or machine) would remain valid regardless of the 
> (incorrect?-)casing.
> Best,
> Nathan

Mr. Yrjana Rankka        | ghard@openlinksw.com
Developer, Virtuoso Team | http://www.openlinksw.com
                          | Making Technology Work For You
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:46:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:11 UTC