W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2011

Re: URI Comparisons: RFC 2616 vs. RDF

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:59:08 +0000
Message-ID: <4D370A4C.5090601@webr3.org>
To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@GMAIL.COM>
CC: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@GMAIL.COM>, "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@W3.ORG>
Hi Alan,

Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> Nathan,
> If you are going to make claims about the effect of other
> specifications on RDF, could you please include pointers to the parts
> of specifications that you are referring to, ideally with illustrative
> examples of the problems you are? Absent that it is too difficult to
> evaluate your claims.
> The conversations on such topics too often devolve into serial opinion
> dumping. If this is to be at all productive we need to be as precise
> as possible.

Good idea :)

I'll create a new page on the wiki and add some examples over the next 
few days, then reply with a pointer later in the week.

ps: as an illustration of how engrained URI normalization is, I've 
capitalized the domain names in the to: and cc: fields, I do hope the 
mail still come through, and hope that you'll accept this email as being 
sent to you. Hopefully we'll also find this mail in the archives shortly 
at htTp://lists.W3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2011Jan/ - Personally 
I'd hope that any statements made using these URIs (asserted by man or 
machine) would remain valid regardless of the (incorrect?-)casing.


Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 16:00:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:11 UTC