W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 13:45:55 +0200
Cc: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>, Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>, nathan@webr3.org, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <E46D2B27-ACA8-46C9-9944-D007C247176B@w3.org>
To: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>

On Apr 3, 2010, at 21:45 , Niklas Lindström wrote:

> 2010/4/3 Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>:
>> Niklas,
>> 
>>> While I have seen definitions of these relations made by the community
>>> before (e.g. used directly in AtomOwl, and a complete listing made by
>>> Ed Summers, which I unfortunately cannot find now),
>> 
>> You're not peradventure talking about [1], no?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>      Michael
>> 
>> [1] http://mediatypes.appspot.com/
> 
> Oh, right. Yes, that's what I had in the back of my mind; I knew my
> memory was off on some aspect. :) That's a great asset as well though.
> Thanks for the reference!

+1

Ivan

> 
> Best regards,
> Niklas
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf







Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 11:44:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:26 UTC