W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 21:45:46 +0200
Message-ID: <m2vcf8107641004031245rcaa8e0acvc840f193231ff2b9@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Cc: Story Henry <henry.story@bblfish.net>, nathan@webr3.org, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
2010/4/3 Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>:
> Niklas,
>
>> While I have seen definitions of these relations made by the community
>> before (e.g. used directly in AtomOwl, and a complete listing made by
>> Ed Summers, which I unfortunately cannot find now),
>
> You're not peradventure talking about [1], no?
>
> Cheers,
>      Michael
>
> [1] http://mediatypes.appspot.com/

Oh, right. Yes, that's what I had in the back of my mind; I knew my
memory was off on some aspect. :) That's a great asset as well though.
Thanks for the reference!

Best regards,
Niklas
Received on Saturday, 3 April 2010 19:46:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:26 UTC