W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 20:56:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4BB79D6B.6060508@webr3.org>
To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
CC: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
Michael Hausenblas wrote:
> Nathan, Phil, All,
> 
>> and quote:
>> "If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be
>>    considered to be "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/"
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt
>>
>> obviously all the links defined by:
>> http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml
>> (from the atom rfc)
>>
>>>> such as edit, self, related etc - with additional consideration to the
>>>> thought that these will end up in rdf via RDFa/grddl etc v soon if not
>>>> already.
>>>>
>>>> Any guidance?
> 
> Yes. Use [1] ...
> 
> My motto is: acting rather than talking. So, I took [2] as a starting point
> - which is already in nice XHTML format - and manually added some RDFa.
> After an hour I ended up with [1] (though, to be fair, two Wii games with
> the kids and consuming some Easter eggs also took place in that hour).
> 
> So, [1] is really a sort of an interim solution (though, in the distributed
> data world I do expect much more of such fixes) and I encourage Phil, who is
> an editor of [2] to use the template from [1] at the 'official' location.
> 
> Happy Easter! (and back to Wii games, for now ;)
> 
> Cheers,
>       Michael
> 
> [1] http://purl.org/NET/atom-link-rel
> [2] http://www.iana.org/assignments/link-relations/link-relations.xhtml
> 

Thanks Michael :)

and strangely I'm playing the wii w/ kids and eating easter eggs too

<hoorah!>

Cheers & Happy Easter,

Nathan
Received on Saturday, 3 April 2010 19:57:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:26 UTC