Bill Roberts wrote: > Thanks everyone who replied. > > It seems that there's a lot of support for the RDFa route in that > (perhaps not statistically significant) sample of opinion. But to > summarise my understanding of your various bits of advice: since > there aren't currently so many applications out there consuming RDF, a > good RDF publisher should provide as many options as possible. Amen! > > Therefore rather than deciding for either RDFa or a content-negotiated > approach, why not do both (and provide a dump file too) Exactly! RDFa vs Content Negotiation is a misnomer re. Web Architecture :-) Kingsley > > Cheers > > Bill > > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.comReceived on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 22:32:16 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:41:34 GMT