W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2009

Re: RDFa vs RDF/XML and content negotiation

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:31:39 -0400
Message-ID: <4A4157CB.2030001@openlinksw.com>
To: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
CC: public-lod@w3.org
Bill Roberts wrote:
> Thanks everyone who replied.
>
> It seems that there's a lot of support for the RDFa route in that 
> (perhaps not statistically significant) sample of opinion.  But to 
> summarise my understanding of your various bits of advice:  since 
> there aren't currently so many applications out there consuming RDF, a 
> good RDF publisher should provide as many options as possible.
Amen!
>
> Therefore rather than deciding for either RDFa or a content-negotiated 
> approach, why not do both (and provide a dump file too)
Exactly!

RDFa vs Content Negotiation is a misnomer re. Web Architecture :-)

Kingsley
>
> Cheers
>
> Bill
>
>
>
>


-- 


Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	      Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO 
OpenLink Software     Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 22:32:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:21 UTC