W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2009

Re: RDFa vs RDF/XML and content negotiation

From: Daniel O'Connor <daniel.oconnor@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:11:49 +0930
Message-ID: <106cc1200906231541s336ad6f9jf9fae511067fecdd@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>, public-lod@w3.org
>
>
>> Therefore rather than deciding for either RDFa or a content-negotiated
>> approach, why not do both (and provide a dump file too)
>>
> Exactly!
>

+1

Also:
You can provide a translation of your rdfa<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDFa>
+xhtml <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHTML> into normal
RDF<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework>through
GRDDL <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GRDDL>.

That basically means into putting a profile attribute into your <head> tag
which points to a resource which says "This is how you pull out RDF from
here".

<head profile="http://ns.inria.fr/grddl/rdfa/">


You could provide links to an installation of Cognition or similar to
extract that on the fly - http://buzzword.org.uk/swignition/grddl

More at
http://www-sop.inria.fr/acacia/personnel/Fabien.Gandon/tmp/grddl/rdfaprimer/PrimerRDFaSection.html
Zemanta <http://www.zemanta.com> helped me add links & pictures to this
email. It can do it for you too. <http://www.zemanta.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 22:42:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:21 UTC