W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > June 2009

Re: RDFa vs RDF/XML and content negotiation

From: Bill Roberts <bill@swirrl.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:32:24 +0200
Message-Id: <7FC83DD3-4517-4C66-ADF6-08DB83B04AB2@swirrl.com>
To: public-lod@w3.org
Thanks everyone who replied.

It seems that there's a lot of support for the RDFa route in that  
(perhaps not statistically significant) sample of opinion.  But to  
summarise my understanding of your various bits of advice:  since  
there aren't currently so many applications out there consuming RDF, a  
good RDF publisher should provide as many options as possible.

Therefore rather than deciding for either RDFa or a content-negotiated  
approach, why not do both (and provide a dump file too)


Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 20:32:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:15:57 UTC