W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2009

Re: [call for comments] voiD 1.0

From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:36:16 +0000
To: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
CC: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, "void-rdfs-internals@googlegroups.com" <void-rdfs-internals@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <C5A86C80.167F%michael.hausenblas@deri.org>


Simon,

Thanks a lot for your comments, very much appreciated (if I gather
correctly, Keith already started to reply ...).

> - My questions on
> <http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/detail?id=19&can=1> still stand.
> ;-)

Sorry, my fault - seems the notification mechanism in Gcode seems not to
work as expected. I've starred that issue, but after closing it  I didn't
get a notification - will take care.


Cheers,
      Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Hausenblas
DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Lower Dangan,
Galway, Ireland, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://sw-app.org/about.html


> From: Simon Reinhardt <simon.reinhardt@koeln.de>
> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:52:07 +0000
> To: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
> Subject: Re: [call for comments] voiD 1.0
> Resent-From: Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
> Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:53:16 +0000
> 
> 
> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>> We are very pleased to announce the release of voiD [1].
> 
> Congratulations!
> 
> My comments:
> 
> - 
> <http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/source/browse/trunk/liftSSM/SSM2void.xslt>
> uses void:uriPattern instead of void:uriRegexPattern and so does the example
> output under <http://rdfs.org/ns/void-guide#sec_4_3_Publishing_tools>.
> I really like the addition of void:uriRegexPattern!
> 
> - I'm not so sure about the correctness of the usage of dcterms:format under
> <http://rdfs.org/ns/void-guide#sec_1_5_Technical_description_features>. First,
> dcterms:format requires a resources rather than a literal. Then, this would
> mean that the void:TechnicalFeature *has* this format, so it would be a
> document, not that it *is* that format. How about:
> :DBpedia void:feature <http://dbpedia.org/resource/RDF/XML> .
> 
> - My questions on
> <http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/detail?id=19&can=1> still stand.
> ;-)
> 
> - I hope there will be some alignment with SIOC in the future (see also
> <http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev/browse_thread/thread/da8a2d4c1f4adf38
> /07370433943f906d?show_docid=07370433943f906d>). What I'm especially after is
> using sioc:has_container instead of dcterms:isPartOf to go from the page of an
> item in the dataset to the description of the dataset (which would be a
> sioc:Container as well).
> I think I will just do this for now (for the project I'm working on) since I'm
> providing discovery via sitemap.xml anyway.
> 
> Cheers,
>   Simon
> 
Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 08:36:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:19 UTC