W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > January 2009

Re: [call for comments] voiD 1.0

From: Keith Alexander <k.j.w.alexander@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:33:01 -0000
To: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uokctb19zdej1c@polar-bear>

Hi Simon,

Thanks for the comments.

I have changed the XSLT to use void:uriRegexPattern

Can you explain why you prefer sioc:has_container to dcterms:isPartOf ?

Keith


On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:52:07 -0000, Simon Reinhardt
<simon.reinhardt@koeln.de> wrote:

>
> Michael Hausenblas wrote:
>> We are very pleased to announce the release of voiD [1].
>
> Congratulations!
>
> My comments:
>
> -  
> <http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/source/browse/trunk/liftSSM/SSM2void.xslt>  
> uses void:uriPattern instead of void:uriRegexPattern and so does the  
> example output under  
> <http://rdfs.org/ns/void-guide#sec_4_3_Publishing_tools>.
> I really like the addition of void:uriRegexPattern!
>
> - I'm not so sure about the correctness of the usage of dcterms:format  
> under  
> <http://rdfs.org/ns/void-guide#sec_1_5_Technical_description_features>.  
> First, dcterms:format requires a resources rather than a literal. Then,  
> this would mean that the void:TechnicalFeature *has* this format, so it  
> would be a document, not that it *is* that format. How about:
> :DBpedia void:feature <http://dbpedia.org/resource/RDF/XML> .
>
> - My questions on  
> <http://code.google.com/p/void-impl/issues/detail?id=19&can=1> still  
> stand. ;-)
>
> - I hope there will be some alignment with SIOC in the future (see also  
> <http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev/browse_thread/thread/da8a2d4c1f4adf38/07370433943f906d?show_docid=07370433943f906d>).  
> What I'm especially after is using sioc:has_container instead of  
> dcterms:isPartOf to go from the page of an item in the dataset to the  
> description of the dataset (which would be a sioc:Container as well).
> I think I will just do this for now (for the project I'm working on)  
> since I'm providing discovery via sitemap.xml anyway.
>
> Cheers,
>   Simon
>
Received on Friday, 30 January 2009 09:34:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:19 UTC