David Huynh wrote: > Kingsley Idehen wrote: >> Question: Is there any fundamental reason why you cannot expose URIs >> or URLs where you have "javascript:{}"? Would this break your work in >> anyway? > Just for you, Kingsley, I have fixed it :-) You might need to > shift-reload to get the latest code. > > I wasn't actually expecting such an intense reaction to just > "javascript:{}". I wonder if that might put off newcomers, who believe > that the slightest profanity against The URIs on this mailing list > will always trigger such adverse reactions. > >> If you expose the URIs, I would then be able to demonstrate what I >> mean using your nice UI, how about that? > Now that that's all behind us, I'm looking forward to see what you > mean. Please, show us what you've got! > > Best, > > David > > David, Awesome!! Ball is now firmly in my court :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen President & CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.comReceived on Sunday, 17 August 2008 17:40:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:41:27 GMT