W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > April 2008

Re: What are proper URIs for RDF representations of real existing content

From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 15:50:39 +0100
Cc: public-lod@w3.org
Message-Id: <6505A38B-938A-4F54-A4BD-A32A29A1B416@cyganiak.de>
To: Mark Diggory <mdiggory@MIT.EDU>


On 4 Apr 2008, at 04:25, Mark Diggory wrote:
> Thinking about this further...
>
>>> /handle/1721.1/36383.rdf serves only RDF/XML.
>
> and, would the resource in this rdf resolved by tacking on the file  
> extension contain the same URI as the example above based on the re- 
> negotiation above? I.E.
>
>>>>>   <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/36383 
>>>>> ">
>
>
> or would it be the location used to resolve the rdf?
>
>>>>>   <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://dspace-test.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/36383.rdf 
>>>>> ">
>
> I assume it would be the former?

Yes, I think that would be best, because if the URI is passed around  
further, then clients can still get HTML or RDF depending on their  
preferences.

Richard


>
>
> -Mark
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Developer and Systems Manager
> MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services
> Massachusetts Institute of Technology
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Friday, 4 April 2008 14:51:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:16 UTC