W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-locadd@w3.org > January 2013

Re: specification of CRS [via Locations and Addresses Community Group]

From: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:04:29 +0100
Message-ID: <50E6E16D.90902@geodan.nl>
To: public-locadd@w3.org
Hello Andrea,

Describing the state of the art seems like a good way to start. And yes, 
I think it would be a good idea to have a list of gaps or weaknesses as 
part of the overview of the state of the art.

I wish you all the best for your efforts to get the group started.

Greetings,
Frans



On 4-1-2013 1:07, Andrea Perego wrote:
> Pleased to meet you, Frans, and welcome on board!
>
> The CG is going to start its activity this month. The idea is to work
> first on a survey on the state of the art. This can be also a basis to
> identify possible gaps in the existing standards against a number of
> use cases, as the issue you raise about CRS/SRS.
>
> Cheers for now
>
> Andrea
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote:
>> Hello all, I have just joined this group (it took some time to get through the
>> subscription process). I hope the group will come to life soon, I think its
>> subject is both interesting and important. Here is one thing that I think would
>> be good to share our thoughts on: the method of specification of the [...]
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------
>>
>> This post sent on Locations and Addresses Community Group
>>
>>
>>
>> 'specification of CRS'
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/community/locadd/2012/12/27/specification-of-crs/
>>
>>
>>
>> Learn more about the Locations and Addresses Community Group:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/community/locadd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Received on Friday, 4 January 2013 14:05:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 4 January 2013 14:05:03 GMT