- From: Frans Knibbe | Geodan <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:04:29 +0100
- To: public-locadd@w3.org
Hello Andrea, Describing the state of the art seems like a good way to start. And yes, I think it would be a good idea to have a list of gaps or weaknesses as part of the overview of the state of the art. I wish you all the best for your efforts to get the group started. Greetings, Frans On 4-1-2013 1:07, Andrea Perego wrote: > Pleased to meet you, Frans, and welcome on board! > > The CG is going to start its activity this month. The idea is to work > first on a survey on the state of the art. This can be also a basis to > identify possible gaps in the existing standards against a number of > use cases, as the issue you raise about CRS/SRS. > > Cheers for now > > Andrea > > > On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Frans Knibbe <frans.knibbe@geodan.nl> wrote: >> Hello all, I have just joined this group (it took some time to get through the >> subscription process). I hope the group will come to life soon, I think its >> subject is both interesting and important. Here is one thing that I think would >> be good to share our thoughts on: the method of specification of the [...] >> >> >> >> ---------- >> >> This post sent on Locations and Addresses Community Group >> >> >> >> 'specification of CRS' >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/locadd/2012/12/27/specification-of-crs/ >> >> >> >> Learn more about the Locations and Addresses Community Group: >> >> http://www.w3.org/community/locadd >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Friday, 4 January 2013 14:05:02 UTC