- From: Peter Murray <peter.murray@lyrasis.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 09:59:26 -0500
- To: public-lld <public-lld@w3.org>
I, too, think it is important to keep focus on the rough categorization that Tom summarized. Thinking about how this all gets explained to the people who haven't followed the story so far, it follow very nicely from explaining what an RDF triple is to here are the sorts of things you can use to fill in the blanks of the triple. Peter On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Thomas Baker wrote: > > Group 1 is supposed to have things like LCSH, AAT, WordNet... > I'd call these "value vocabularies" because its members are > typically used as values. > > Group 2 is supposed to have things like FOAF, BIBO, DC, even > SKOS and FRBR (seen as vocabularies). I'd call these "element > vocabularies" because they are composed largely of properties, > which are typically used as predicates. -- Peter Murray Peter.Murray@lyrasis.org tel:+1-678-235-2955 Assistant Director http://dltj.org/about/ Lyrasis -- Great Libraries. Strong Communities. Innovative Answers. The Disruptive Library Technology Jester http://dltj.org/ Attrib-Noncomm-Share http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/
Received on Friday, 3 December 2010 15:00:01 UTC