W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2012

Re: current thinking on language maps?

From: Lin Clark <lin.w.clark@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 09:57:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CACho_Av-R5r7+vjWUG1-OsrFUpOc6ZKJsE9m2+w_m2hoT9ZTAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Cc: public-linked-json@w3.org
Hi Markus,

Thanks for your insight on the thread, I just responded:

You're right that it doesn't solve our problem fully. Because my version
uses "@id" instead of blank nodes, we would lose the language version
information for field values when it was transformed to other RDF formats.
However, based on a little experimentation it seemed like the distinction
between language versions might be maintained throughout the JSON-LD
transformations? If so, then this might be good enough for us.

I should be able to join for the call tomorrow, would be happy to discuss
this further.


On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Markus Lanthaler

> Hi Lin,
> I just posted a comment [1] on your post.
> > I think that Niklas L's latest proposal for language maps
> > would fit our use case without adding too much conceptual
> > overhead.
> Quick summary: If I understand your use case correctly, I don't think
> language maps solve your problem. I'm wondering what the rest of the group
> thinks!?
> Anyway, I would like to bring this language map stuff in general and the
> container functionality in general forward. Maybe we should put this onto
> tomorrow's telecon agenda. Would be great if you have time to join to give
> us some more insights.
> [1] http://groups.drupal.org/node/244158#comment-793008
> --
> Markus Lanthaler
> @markuslanthaler

Lin Clark
Drupal Consultant

Received on Monday, 30 July 2012 13:57:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:53:20 UTC