W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-linked-json@w3.org > July 2012

current thinking on language maps?

From: Lin Clark <lin.w.clark@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 17:35:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CACho_Avo8_hx-VrG1PfdrThGoqyfA1JQFmN7MRL2bK_Oj1FMAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-linked-json@w3.org
Hi all,

First off, thanks so much to everyone for their help in figuring out how
JSON-LD can work for Drupal's services initiative.

I wrote up an explanation <http://groups.drupal.org/node/244158> of the
JSON-LD features that we'll be using... it's meant in part as an
introduction to basic Linked Data concepts as they are used in JSON-LD,
since there are very few Drupal devs who have any knowledge of LD. But I
also cover two parts of the spec that we need which are still under
development.

The most important of these for our use case is language version handling.
I explain both named graphs and language maps as possible ways to handle
language versions. However, I do not feel comfortable moving forward with
named graphs because I believe it is too much of a Linked Data specific
concept, and the increased complexity would limit the number of people who
could maintain this part of Drupal.

I think that Niklas L's latest
proposal<https://github.com/json-ld/json-ld.org/issues/133#issuecomment-6879811>for
language maps would fit our use case without adding too much
conceptual
overhead. Specifically, I would envision something like this snippet:
http://pastebin.com/zeHz1CG7

I was wondering what the current thinking on (and support for) the language
maps proposal is?

Cheers,
Lin

-- 
Lin Clark
Drupal Consultant

lin-clark.com
twitter.com/linclark
Received on Sunday, 29 July 2012 21:36:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 16:25:37 GMT