W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ldp-wg@w3.org > January 2013

Re: container/member models

From: Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:10:33 +0000
CC: "public-ldp-wg@w3.org" <public-ldp-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <8EB3C6BE-FEC5-47CE-BE45-F4FADDF3278E@uk.fujitsu.com>
To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>

hi Arnaud, 

> > From: Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com> 
> > ...
> > Arnaud and Henry, 
> > 
> > I thought the suggestion from Raśl was a very good one. 
> > So, just to get this straight:  where should "alternative model" / 
> > "variations around the current model" content be placed ? 
> > 
> > thanks, 
> > Roger 
> 
> Proposals for the LDP Model go on the wiki: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/ISSUE-37 
> Proposals for Aggregations go on the wiki: http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/ISSUE-34 

OK. I'm taking that as the definitive answer !!! Thanks. 

> Discussions go to this mailing list. 
> 
> I expect the model page to be limited to LDPR and LDPC for now. If we eventually decide to extend LDP with some aggregation we will extend the model accordingly.

The functionality covered by "aggregation" seems pretty fundamental to writable LD, and we should cover it. 
That's what I think anyway. 

regards, 
Roger


> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Software Standards Architect - IBM Software Group




Received on Thursday, 17 January 2013 22:11:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:44 UTC