W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > May 2004

Re: draft-duerst-iri-07.txt: 2 week mailing list last call

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 13:03:35 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040512130310.00bcf980@127.0.0.1>
To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, public-iri@w3.org
Cc: Michel Suignard <michelsu@microsoft.com>

For the record, I'm entirely satisfied with this response.

#g
--

At 18:13 12/05/04 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:
>Hello Graham,
>
>I have listed this as issue normRef-33.
>
>
>At 12:02 04/05/10 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>
>>References
>>
>>I think RFC2119 should appear under Normative references, not Informative.
>
>Done.
>
>
>>I don't know about this, but should [UNIV4] and [UNI9] be normative?
>
>They are referenced in a normative sentence in the bidi section, so
>yes, fixed. I guess we could move [UNIV4] out of that, if we really
>want (our reference practice seems to lean towards ISO 10646,
>rather than Unicode).
>
>Michel, what do you think? Can you have a look at it?
>I guess the reference to 10646 may also need updating,
>can you give me the newest version?
>
>
>Regards,    Martin.

------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 09:26:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 April 2012 19:51:53 GMT