W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > May 2004

Re: draft-duerst-iri-07.txt: 2 week mailing list last call

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2004 18:13:20 +0900
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20040512180623.03bdea90@localhost>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>, public-iri@w3.org
Cc: Michel Suignard <michelsu@microsoft.com>

Hello Graham,

I have listed this as issue normRef-33.


At 12:02 04/05/10 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:

>References
>
>I think RFC2119 should appear under Normative references, not Informative.

Done.


>I don't know about this, but should [UNIV4] and [UNI9] be normative?

They are referenced in a normative sentence in the bidi section, so
yes, fixed. I guess we could move [UNIV4] out of that, if we really
want (our reference practice seems to lean towards ISO 10646,
rather than Unicode).

Michel, what do you think? Can you have a look at it?
I guess the reference to 10646 may also need updating,
can you give me the newest version?


Regards,    Martin.
Received on Wednesday, 12 May 2004 05:27:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 April 2012 19:51:53 GMT