W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-iri@w3.org > May 2004

Re: draft-duerst-iri-07.txt: 2 week mailing list last call

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:02:51 +0900
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.J.20040513130000.03dda408@localhost>
To: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, public-iri@w3.org

Hello Graham,

Many thanks for your quick responses. I have closed issues
normRef-33, 3.1BC-norm-29, and needAPI-34.

Regards,     Martin.

At 13:03 04/05/12 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:

>For the record, I'm entirely satisfied with this response.
>
>#g
>--
>
>At 18:13 12/05/04 +0900, Martin Duerst wrote:
>>Hello Graham,
>>
>>I have listed this as issue normRef-33.
>>
>>
>>At 12:02 04/05/10 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:
>>
>>>References
>>>
>>>I think RFC2119 should appear under Normative references, not Informative.
>>
>>Done.
>>
>>
>>>I don't know about this, but should [UNIV4] and [UNI9] be normative?
>>
>>They are referenced in a normative sentence in the bidi section, so
>>yes, fixed. I guess we could move [UNIV4] out of that, if we really
>>want (our reference practice seems to lean towards ISO 10646,
>>rather than Unicode).
>>
>>Michel, what do you think? Can you have a look at it?
>>I guess the reference to 10646 may also need updating,
>>can you give me the newest version?
>>
>>
>>Regards,    Martin.
>
>------------
>Graham Klyne
>For email:
>http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Thursday, 13 May 2004 00:14:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 30 April 2012 19:51:53 GMT