W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ietf-w3c@w3.org > January 2009

clean up uri-review archive, please? [Fwd: Re: Registering the about: URI scheme]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:58:57 -0600
To: webmaster@ietf.org
Cc: public-ietf-w3c <public-ietf-w3c@w3.org>, Joseph A Holsten <joseph@josephholsten.com>, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Message-Id: <1233068337.13077.8914.camel@pav.lan>

The spam in the uri-review archive is causing editors of
potential new schemes to back away from using it,
even though per RFC 4395 it's the official forum.


-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: Joseph A Holsten <joseph@josephholsten.com>
> To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
> Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Lachlan
> Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
> Subject: Re: Registering the about: URI scheme
> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:04:26 -0600
> Hash: SHA1
> Julian,
> Everything sounds fine, some questions inline.
> Julian Reschke wrote:
> > - on the front page, note where feedback should go (IMHO the best  
> > place would be the IETF uri-review mailing list)
> I haven't seen any other draft do this, so I'm unsure of where should  
> this go. Abstract? uri-review sounds fine. Too bad the place is a  
> spam haven: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 27 January 2009 14:59:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 January 2009 14:59:07 GMT