Re: clean up uri-review archive, please? [Fwd: Re: Registering the about: URI scheme]

Hello Dan,

 From the IETF WG Chairs mailing list, I know the entity responsible
for the IETF email archives is working on this problem. A solution
to make sure no new mail gets in is being deployed as we speak, and
plans are made for removing the accumulated span.

In the future, I suggest to report such problems directly,
in the current case to ietf-action@ietf.org (not necessary
anymore actually; for more addresses, see
http://www.ietf.org/secretariat.html).

Regards,    Martin.


At 23:58 09/01/27, Dan Connolly wrote:
>
>The spam in the uri-review archive is causing editors of
>potential new schemes to back away from using it,
>even though per RFC 4395 it's the official forum.
>
>http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4395.txt
>
>-------- Forwarded Message --------
>> From: Joseph A Holsten <joseph@josephholsten.com>
>> To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
>> Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Lachlan
>> Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
>> Subject: Re: Registering the about: URI scheme
>> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:04:26 -0600
>> 
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> 
>> Julian,
>> Everything sounds fine, some questions inline.
>> 
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>> > - on the front page, note where feedback should go (IMHO the best  
>> > place would be the IETF uri-review mailing list)
>> I haven't seen any other draft do this, so I'm unsure of where should  
>> this go. Abstract? uri-review sounds fine. Too bad the place is a  
>> spam haven: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/uri-review
>
>-- 
>Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E


#-#-#  Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
#-#-#  http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp       mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp

Received on Wednesday, 28 January 2009 04:02:15 UTC