Hi Christian, Lieske, Christian wrote: > Hi Felix, > > Thanks for looking into SVG print. > > Your information on existing SVG provisions which would allow for the use of > ITS is very helpful. > I sympathize with your proposal to attempt an explicit reference to ITS. Do > you > suggest to have this reference bound to SVG (as opposed to "bound SVG > Tiny")? > SVG "full" 1.1. is a recommendation, so it's hard to get changes into it http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-SVG11-20030114/ SVG "full" 1.2 is not in a stable state, AFAIK, see the "status" section http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-SVG12-20050413/ so we can't expect a lot of progress here. SVG tiny is the specification in the SVG area which seems to me likely to make the fastest progress. See again the "status" section at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-SVGMobile12-20060810/ These are the reasons why I proposed SVG Tiny. Cheers, FelixReceived on Tuesday, 22 January 2008 08:13:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 22 January 2008 08:13:03 GMT