W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > July to September 2007

RE: BP summary

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 06:06:52 -0600
To: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003101c7c934$20a7f8f0$0532a8c0@BREIZH>

Hi Felix, all,

> you might want to be consistent with the text which is 
> written in the BP statements. See e.g. table for BP 10:
> "Provide ITS rules document where its:termRule indicates 
> terminology-related information."
> and actual BP text:
> "Define what elements are related to terminology information"
> which is quite different. Currently, some table entries 
> are similar to the BP text, others are different as above.

I thought about that, but I'm not sure how we could do this for the cases where you have different actions for new and existing
schemas.

Shouldn't the table text be more like the main point(s) of the "How to do this" rather than the BP headline?

-ys
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:06:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:09 UTC