W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: BP summary

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:10:09 +0900
Message-ID: <469E0321.9060705@w3.org>
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org

Hi Yves,

Yves Savourel wrote:
> Hi Felix, all,
>
>   
>> you might want to be consistent with the text which is 
>> written in the BP statements. See e.g. table for BP 10:
>> "Provide ITS rules document where its:termRule indicates 
>> terminology-related information."
>> and actual BP text:
>> "Define what elements are related to terminology information"
>> which is quite different. Currently, some table entries 
>> are similar to the BP text, others are different as above.
>>     
>
> I thought about that, but I'm not sure how we could do this for the cases where you have different actions for new and existing
> schemas.
>
> Shouldn't the table text be more like the main point(s) of the "How to do this" rather than the BP headline?
>   
that's fine as well. I'm not against using the main points, but it looks 
strange that some of them resemble the BP headlines. So as a solution we 
could also change these to be different. What do you think?

cheers,

Felix
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:10:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:09 UTC