W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > July to September 2007

Re: BP summary

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:10:09 +0900
Message-ID: <469E0321.9060705@w3.org>
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org

Hi Yves,

Yves Savourel wrote:
> Hi Felix, all,
>> you might want to be consistent with the text which is 
>> written in the BP statements. See e.g. table for BP 10:
>> "Provide ITS rules document where its:termRule indicates 
>> terminology-related information."
>> and actual BP text:
>> "Define what elements are related to terminology information"
>> which is quite different. Currently, some table entries 
>> are similar to the BP text, others are different as above.
> I thought about that, but I'm not sure how we could do this for the cases where you have different actions for new and existing
> schemas.
> Shouldn't the table text be more like the main point(s) of the "How to do this" rather than the BP headline?
that's fine as well. I'm not against using the main points, but it looks 
strange that some of them resemble the BP headlines. So as a solution we 
could also change these to be different. What do you think?


Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2007 12:10:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:09 UTC