W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

RE: Integrating feedback on the ITS tagset working draft

From: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:41:18 -0700
To: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000e01c6317d$1d347d10$8f05a8c0@Breizh>

I was going to propose "dicombobulated" instead of "dislocated",
but "global" does sound better.


-----Original Message-----
From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:38 AM
To: Lieske, Christian; public-i18n-its@w3.org
Subject: Re: Integrating feedback on the ITS tagset working draft

Lieske, Christian wrote:

>Local/global sounds good although a global rule may only have local 
>effect (for example relate only to a single "p" element).
Normally you don't know that when you write the rule.
Even if you say "//p[@xml:id='theta']", you don't whether that matches zero, one or more instances in the file(s) you are

All rules are global, by definition....

Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 15:41:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC