W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

Re: Integrating feedback on the ITS tagset working draft

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:08:01 +0900
Message-ID: <43F20E71.6000402@w3.org>
To: Yves Savourel <ysavourel@translate.com>
Cc: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Yves Savourel wrote:
> I was going to propose "dicombobulated" instead of "dislocated",
> but "global" does sound better.

Should we go for global / local then? It seems that everybody agrees.

- Felix

> 
> -ys
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 7:38 AM
> To: Lieske, Christian; public-i18n-its@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Integrating feedback on the ITS tagset working draft
> 
> 
> Lieske, Christian wrote:
> 
>> Local/global sounds good although a global rule may only have local 
>> effect (for example relate only to a single "p" element).
>>  
>>
> Normally you don't know that when you write the rule.
> Even if you say "//p[@xml:id='theta']", you don't whether that matches zero, one or more instances in the file(s) you are
> processing.
> 
> All rules are global, by definition....
> 
> Sebastian
> 
> 



Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 17:08:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC