W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2006

[Bug 2621] On conformance levels: Have a simple conformance: in situ, with default selectors

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:45:26 +0000
To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Cc:
Message-Id: <E1EzbyY-00008M-BR@wiggum.w3.org>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2621





------- Additional Comments From fsasaki@w3.org  2006-01-19 15:45 -------
input to conformance discussion:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/REC-xml-events-20031014/Overview.html#s_event_module_conformance
I like this definition because the properties of XML Events are very similar to
ITS: they are not stand-alone document types, they are supposed to be
integreated into host languages like HTML or DITA. I think we could write a
conformance section like in the link above, with
- document conformance
- host language conformance
- instead of user agend conformance a "ITS processor" conformance. That is the
product we still have to define.
Received on Thursday, 19 January 2006 15:45:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:43:06 UTC