W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-i18n-its@w3.org > January to March 2005

RE: Term identification

From: Richard, Francois <francois.richard@hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:52:30 +0100
Message-ID: <3F3894AC7A13B04E83CEBC95CFD3047EF1F926@idaexc03.emea.cpqcorp.net>
To: <public-i18n-its@w3.org>



>-----Original Message-----
>From: public-i18n-its-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:public-i18n-its-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Yves Savourel
>Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:26 PM
>To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
>Subject: Term identification
>
>
>
>Thanks Tim for all the comments.
>I'll start a few thread from your notes:
>
>> From Tim's comments on Requirements for localisable DTD design:
>>
>> 2.18 Term identification
>> Yep, this is good : who decides what a Term is though ? This sounds 
>> like a bit of repetition though - wasn't
>
>I would see this mechanism used different ways:
>- By authors, through their authoring tool interface, to 
>select terms they know should be treated as such. - By 
>terminology tools that do term extraction or translation tools 
>that use a list of known terms.

We could classified "term" under different categories to define what a term is, what it is used for and the implications on the l10n process. For instance, it could be a term from a maintained glossary (implying an available translation), it could be a "cie approved" term requiring careful l10n and review, it could be a UI related term... 2.14 section could go under this too.
/Francois

>
>One note: LISA, who is maintaining TBX (TermBase eXchange 
>format), is working on TBK-Link, a light-weight tag set that 
>helps linking terms in the document to a TBX store. I think 
>TBX-Link will be available for review soon. Andrzej is 
>actually one of the editors.
>
>-ys
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 13:53:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:12:44 GMT