On Thu Dec 18 13:52:38 2008 Phil Archer said: > However, all the textual elements are essentially annotations and so > need not be restricted. Except for tags, which are datatype properties and visible to reasoners, so due care is called for. Good news is, I tried Pellet and it didn't blink an eye: a slight variation of DR example 2-14 where the definition of tagset_1 goes like <owl:intersectionOf rdf:parseType="Collection"> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#tag" /> <owl:hasValue xml:lang="en">New Releases</owl:hasValue> </owl:Restriction> <owl:Restriction> <owl:onProperty rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#tag" /> <owl:hasValue xml:lang="nl">Nieuwe Releases</owl:hasValue> </owl:Restriction> </owl:intersectionOf> works just fine (that is, our Semantic PP returns both wdrs:tag triples with their xml:lang attribute). sReceived on Thursday, 18 December 2008 14:52:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:00 GMT