W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-hydra@w3.org > January 2015

Re: remove hydra:Resource and hydra:Class (ISSUE-90)

From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 09:25:57 +0100
Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
Message-Id: <4943F284-0614-458F-BEF4-2DF9AB4E7668@ugent.be>
To: Markus Lanthaler <markus.lanthaler@gmx.net>
Hi Markus,

> do you think it makes
> sense to keep something like hydra:Class given that they are quite different
> from RDFS classes due to hydra:supportedProperty?

> It is just that the model is quite different from
> RDFS and much closer to the one of most OO programming languages. As such,
> it might be worth to give it a name.

Could you elaborate a bit on the above? How are the models different?
(And to what extent is it possible/desirable to bend the RDF model?)

From the ontology, I had not deduced an impact on supportedProperty
(and still doubt that until further notice ;-)

Received on Friday, 9 January 2015 08:26:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 9 January 2015 08:26:25 UTC